Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sustainable Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture: Key Considerations for Assessing Environmental and Economic Performance
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy and Health, Food Research and Innovation.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0814-5258
CREA, Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria—Centro di Ricerca Zootecnia e Acquacoltura, Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.
Department of Economics and Management (Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy and Health, Food Research and Innovation.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2473-790X
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Reviews in Aquaculture, ISSN 1753-5123, E-ISSN 1753-5131, Vol. 18, no 4Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA), defined as the co-production of species at different trophic levels, is conceptually appealing. By utilising complementary functions of different species, it holds opportunities for lower environmental impact, higher productivity, and increased profitability in comparison with conventional monoculture. However, whether those advantages materialise in practice remains unclear. Here we review available life cycle assessment (LCA) and cost–benefit analysis (CBA) studies of IMTAs to further the current understanding of environmental and economic performance. We find that, overall, LCAs conclude that IMTAs investigated have not been able to deliver on environmental promises, while CBAs generally find that IMTAs have both better financial performance and lower environmental externalities than monoculture equivalents. The main reasons for these contrasting findings include the nature of the systems assessed so far—often theoretical or experimental set-ups with non-optimised designs—combined with methodological choices in assessments. The findings of the review thus suggest that it is still unclear to what extent IMTA can deliver on its promises in practice, and that IMTA is no panacea for aquaculture but requires careful design to be effective for its intended use. Integrating robust LCAs and CBAs early in the development phase can help identify viable IMTA set-ups based on key drivers of environmental and economic performance and, in this way, minimise the risks of misaligned practices. A first step towards realising the potential of IMTA is to carry out robust assessments that avoid key mistakes in both LCAs and CBAs, to which end we provide hands-on recommendations for future assessments

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley , 2026. Vol. 18, no 4
Keywords [en]
aquaculture, cost–benefit analysis, externalities, IMTA, life cycle assessment
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-82509DOI: 10.1111/raq.70192Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105046501982OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-82509DiVA, id: diva2:2093500
Note

Funding text 1: This work was supported by Formas, Ministero dell\u2019Universit\u00E0 e della Ricerca (MUR), Suomen Akatemia and the European Union through the Sustainable Blue Economy Partnership (SBEP2023-725). The Sustainable Blue Economy Partnership (project number: SBEP2023-725) is acknowledged for funding. We also want to thank Yannic Wocken and Riccardo Napolitano for input and discussions in drafting the LCA recommendations for the BLUEBOOST project. The authors used Microsoft 365 Copilot Design for generating pictures for Figure\u00A01. The authors confirm that they have reviewed and verified the content generated by the AI tool for accuracy and integrity.;

Funding text 2: This work was supported by Formas, Ministero dell\u2019Universit\u00E0 e della Ricerca (MUR), Suomen Akatemia and the European Union through the Sustainable Blue Economy Partnership (SBEP2023\u2010725).  Funding text 3: The Sustainable Blue Economy Partnership (project number: SBEP2023\u2010725) is acknowledged for funding. We also want to thank Yannic Wocken and Riccardo Napolitano for input and discussions in drafting the LCA recommendations for the BLUEBOOST project. The authors used Microsoft 365 Copilot Design for generating pictures for Figure 1 . The authors confirm that they have reviewed and verified the content generated by the AI tool for accuracy and integrity.

Funding details: Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; Suomen Akatemia; Formas; Research Council of Finland, AKA; European Union through the Sustainable Blue Economy Partnership (SBEP2023-725); Sustainable Blue Economy Partnership; Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca (MUR); European Union; The Sustainable Blue Economy Partnership, (SBEP2023‐725)

Available from: 2026-08-19 Created: 2026-08-19 Last updated: 2026-08-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hornborg, SaraLangeland, MarkusZiegler, Friederike
By organisation
Food Research and Innovation
In the same journal
Reviews in Aquaculture
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 2 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf