Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Are mandatory auditing requirements in small firms justified by their benefits?: a literature review
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5804-9454
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0430-5090
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4853-0399
Institutionen för fastigheter och byggande, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, KTH, Stockholm, Sverige.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6810-1137
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: The Nordic Journal of Business, ISSN 2342-9003, E-ISSN 2342-9011, Vol. 75, no 1, p. 30-54Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The regulation of auditing for privately held firms varies across the world. While countries suchas the United States and Canada impose no general audit requirement for private firms, manyEuropean Union (EU) Member States mandate audits even for small entities. The EU Accounting Directive (2013/34/EU) sets minimum thresholds for audit exemptions but allows MemberStates to adopt stricter national rules, creating variation across the EU. This paper reviews theoretical and empirical literature on the regulation of private-firm auditing. It explores justifications for audit mandates for small private firms, including externalities, behavioral considerations related to tax compliance and financial misconduct, and costs and benefits of voluntaryauditing. In addition, the study reviews legal frameworks for statutory audits in selected EUcountries and highlights how national policies and risk assessments shape audit thresholdsand enforcement strategies. The review concludes by identifying gaps in the literature and suggesting areas for future research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Association of Business Schools Finland , 2026. Vol. 75, no 1, p. 30-54
Keywords [en]
Mandatory audits, audit costs, audit benefits, audit regulation
National Category
Business Administration Law
Research subject
business law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-257671OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-257671DiVA, id: diva2:2092833
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2022-05453Available from: 2026-08-17 Created: 2026-08-17 Last updated: 2026-08-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher’s full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Alexeyeva, IrinaFrii, PeterHenrikson, Ann-SofiePersson, Annina H.Stålnacke, OscarSundgren, Stefan
By organisation
Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE)Department of Law
In the same journal
The Nordic Journal of Business
Business AdministrationLaw

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 72 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf