Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Here today, gone tomorrow?: Managerial perceptions of opportunities and challenges with temporary employment in eldercare
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work. Univ Gävle, Fac Hlth & Occupat Studies, Dept Social Work Criminol & Public Hlth, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0979-3986
Univ Gävle, Fac Hlth & Occupat Studies, Dept Occupat Hlth Psychol & Sports Sci, Gävle, Sweden..
Univ Gävle, Fac Hlth & Occupat Studies, Dept Occupat Hlth Psychol & Sports Sci, Gävle, Sweden.;Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Unit Intervent & Implementat Res Worker Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden..
Univ Gävle, Fac Educ & Business Studies, Dept Business & Econom Studies, Gävle, Sweden..
2026 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 26, no 1, article id 1031Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Temporary employment is widely used in eldercare to address staffing shortages, but heavy reliance on temporary workers may compromise continuity of care, staff workload, and quality of care. Managers are key to how staffing is organised and handled in daily practice. This study examined how managers at different organisational levels perceived the opportunities and challenges of temporary employment in municipal eldercare.

Methods

This qualitative study was based on semi-structured interviews with 16 managers across four organisational levels in Swedish municipal eldercare, including residential care homes, home care services, and higher-level management. The interview guide focused on managers’ experiences of temporary employment, staffing practices, care continuity, work environment, and perceived effects on care quality. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results

Three themes were identified. Balancing staffing on a tightrope describes managers’ struggle to ensure continuity in a system that relies on short-term solutions and often prioritising shift coverage over competence. Leading with tied hands captures managers’ limited control over recruitment and workforce planning, which reinforced reliance on temporary employment. From rigidity to flexibility highlights managers’ suggestions for improving staffing stability. Managers across levels identified similar challenges, but their priorities differed. First-line managers focused on daily staffing, staff well-being, and quality of care, while higher-level managers emphasised long-term planning. Temporary workers helped cover staffing gaps, but also increased permanent employees’ workloads and complicated workforce planning. Managers expressed frustration with centralised staffing decisions that prioritised immediate coverage over long-term stability. Temporary workers were often treated as interchangeable rather than integrated team members, reflecting systemic problems in staffing practices.

Conclusion

Temporary workers are essential for keeping eldercare services running, but over-reliance on temporary employment may reinforce reactive staffing practices, increase pressure on permanent staff, and weaken continuity. Managers suggested better onboarding, greater local hiring control, and dedicated staffing pools. Addressing these issues requires both immediate measures to integrate temporary workers into regular teams and longer-term changes in workforce planning, staffing levels, and local managerial influence.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2026. Vol. 26, no 1, article id 1031
Keywords [en]
Flexible employment, Home care, Precarious work, Residential care home, Staffing shortages, Work environment, Zero-hour contracts
National Category
Social Work Work Sciences Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-595427DOI: 10.1186/s12913-026-15246-yISI: 001835242200001PubMedID: 42527915Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105046146351OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-595427DiVA, id: diva2:2092075
Part of project
Flexible work & Opportunity and Challenge (FLOC), Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and WelfareAvailable from: 2026-08-13 Created: 2026-08-13 Last updated: 2026-08-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2887 kB)19 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2887 kBChecksum SHA-512
d78425f78a7755c12df2b9e90cc9857ada0f358f8681a04c2855c831a7cafe130403857d84d91193fc275a43530eddd4830dfd2abb8598daa6625087e893f94f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindmark, Tomas
By organisation
Department of Social Work
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Social WorkWork SciencesNursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 342 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf