Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Leader Perspectives On Implementing Time Together: a qualitative process evaluation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå (SWE).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0735-8473
Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Ume (SWE).
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Umeå University, Umeå (SWE).
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå (SWE).
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 16, no 6, p. e117894-e117894Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives

Time Together (TT) is a nursing intervention designed with a focus on increasing the possibility of patients and staff engaging in joint activities. Previous research points towards implementation difficulties but there are no studies specifically investigating the process of implementing TT in psychiatric inpatient care (PIC).

Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore mid-level leaders' and implementation leads' perspectives on implementing TT in PIC, analysed through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Design

This qualitative study used semistructured interviews with 11 mid-level leaders and implementation leads who took part in implementing TT. The interviews were analysed using deductive qualitative content analysis, with the CFIR applied as a structured matrix in the analysis.Setting The study was conducted in PIC settings at three wards within secondary care healthcare services in northern Sweden.

Participants

Participants were 11 mid-level leaders and implementation leads involved in the implementation of TT in PIC.Interventions TT is scheduled for 1 hour, 5 days a week. During this hour, nursing staff and patients engage in joint activities, while one or two staff members oversee administrative duties. No meetings, visits or other ward-related activities are scheduled during this hour.

Results

Deductive content analysis resulted in 15 categories sorted into 4 domains and 11 constructs. TT was perceived as advantageous and aligned with the wards' mission. However, one key finding was that mid-level leaders and implementation leads found implementation challenging as they perceived that some innovation deliverers viewed joint activities within TT as lacking value and not being 'proper work'. Furthermore, there was a need for more information and a clearer rationale for the intervention in order to improve implementation and delivery.

Conclusions

The findings indicate a discrepancy in values and attitudes between leaders and innovation deliverers regarding what constitutes meaningful care in psychiatric inpatient settings. Implementation was further influenced by challenges related to leadership and motivating others. Barriers to implementing TT may not be addressable through implementation and intervention training alone. Instead, implementation planning should also consider intervention deliverers' values and beliefs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2026. Vol. 16, no 6, p. e117894-e117894
Keywords [en]
Implementation Science, Qualitative Research, Mental Health, Hospitals, Nursing Care, Quality Improvement
National Category
Nursing Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Research subject
NURSING AND PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE, Nursing science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-25687DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117894ISI: 001807039500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105043380028OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-25687DiVA, id: diva2:2090503
Note

CC BY 4.0

Available from: 2026-08-07 Created: 2026-08-07 Last updated: 2026-08-07

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(284 kB)15 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 284 kBChecksum SHA-512
6337b4116e06ce9e72d2ca29c52aea54d8042cc95a05fd4cc96524f3d9b35a4a751b1dc6ccf3786802d67879da64b46784c5e3577d90c50b01542834c6665f2c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Glantz, AndreasHällgren Graneheim, Ulla
By organisation
Section for nursing - graduate level
In the same journal
BMJ Open
NursingHealth Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 118 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf