Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
International development of a lupus-specific instrument to assess cognitive symptoms in patients with SLE: Lupus Brain Fog Severity Scale (LBFSS) study
Department of Rheumatology, National Reference Center for Autoimmune Diseases (RESO), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Rheumatology Unity, AOU Cagliari, Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Regional Center for Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases (GO-CREAR), Rosario, Argentina.
Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Oriente, Ciudad Bolivar, Venezuela.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Lupus Science and Medicine, E-ISSN 2053-8790, Vol. 13, no 2, article id e002148Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Cognitive symptoms such as 'brain fog' are frequent and disabling in patients with SLE. We aimed to develop and validate the Lupus Brain Fog Severity Scale (LBFSS), the first patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for cognitive symptoms in SLE.

Methods: The LBFSS was developed using a multi-step international approach involving healthcare professionals and patients with SLE. Patients provided free-text descriptions of brain fog, generating candidate domains through thematic analysis (step 1). Domains were rated for relevance (step 2) and those retained converted into self-assessable items (step 3). The pilot LBFSS was iteratively refined (step 4). The finalised LBFSS was validated (step 5) in a large international SLE cohort. Psychometric evaluation included internal consistency, exploratory factor analysis and assessment of construct, convergent, known-groups and criterion-related validity.

Results: In step 1, 147 SLE participants across 39 countries generated 21 domains for cognitive symptoms, of which 13 were retained in consensus (step 2), converted into self-assessable items (step 3) and iteratively refined using patient and physician feedback. In step 5, validation of the LBFSS instrument in 378 patients from 36 countries demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.95) and a unidimensional structure explaining 62.2% of variance. LBFSS scores were significantly higher in participants reporting brain fog (p<0.0001), confirming known-group validity. Construct validity was supported by significant correlations with functional impact and symptom severity (rho=0.46-0.65, p<0.0001), strong convergent validity with the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-20 (rho=0.84, p<0.0001) while the discriminative performance for presence versus absence of self-reported brain fog was high (area under the curve=0.85).

Conclusion: The LBFSS is a new, valid and feasible PROM to assess brain fog and cognitive symptoms in SLE.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2026. Vol. 13, no 2, article id e002148
Keywords [en]
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Autoimmune Diseases, Health-Related Quality Of Life, Patient Reported Outcome Measures
National Category
Rheumatology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-130202DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2026-002148ISI: 001819457800001PubMedID: 42442803OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-130202DiVA, id: diva2:2087929
Available from: 2026-07-23 Created: 2026-07-23 Last updated: 2026-08-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Parodis, Ioannis
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Lupus Science and Medicine
Rheumatology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 19 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf