Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The effect of complications on the esophageal cancer surgeon: an international survey exploring the impact these have on professional and personal life
Queen Elizabeth Hosp Birmingham, Dept Upper Gastrointestinal Surg, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2GW, England..
Queen Elizabeth Hosp Birmingham, Dept Upper Gastrointestinal Surg, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2GW, England..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Upper Abdominal Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1308-4592
Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Dept Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye..
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Diseases of the esophagus, ISSN 1120-8694, E-ISSN 1442-2050, Vol. 39, no 3, article id doag056Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Esophagectomy is one of the highest risk surgical procedures and complications are common. While patient safety remains the primary focus, the impact on healthcare staff-the so-called 'second victims'-is often overlooked. Evidence suggests that a large proportion of surgeons experience emotional, professional, and social consequences following adverse outcomes. Our aims were to explore the effect of complications on personal and professional wellbeing and to identify systems and support required to help surgeons. An online survey, containing questions on surgeon demographics, the impact of surgical complications on personal and professional wellbeing, and current support systems available, was distributed globally to practicing esophageal cancer surgeons.A total of 100 responses were analysed from 30 countries. The median number of esophagectomies performed was 18 (IQR 0-90; n = 100)/annually. The complications with the most significant impact included patient mortality, gastric conduit necrosis and tracheobronchial injury. About 73% of surgeons reported changes in personal relationships and 66% experienced workplace pressures. Support was mainly obtained from colleagues (67%) or family (30%), however, 29% sought no support. 55% felt they received adequate support. About 58% felt under-supported by their particular institution. Complications after esophagectomy significantly affect surgeons' emotional wellbeing and clinical practice. While peer support was valued, many felt under-supported institutionally. These findings highlight the need for structured support systems to protect surgeon wellbeing and maintain safe surgical standards.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2026. Vol. 39, no 3, article id doag056
Keywords [en]
cancer, cancer surgery, esophageal cancers
National Category
Surgery Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-593046DOI: 10.1093/dote/doag056ISI: 001796176300001PubMedID: 42315174Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105042152485OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-593046DiVA, id: diva2:2082893
Available from: 2026-07-01 Created: 2026-07-01 Last updated: 2026-07-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hedberg, Jakob
By organisation
Upper Abdominal Surgery
In the same journal
Diseases of the esophagus
SurgeryCancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 28 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf