Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Thinking through forests: Colonialism, capitalism, and the global timber trade
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History. Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0835-5896
Number of Authors: 22026 (English)In: Journal of Historical Geography, ISSN 0305-7488, E-ISSN 1095-8614, Vol. 92, p. A1-A6Article in journal, Editorial material (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This introduction to the special issue on timber colonialism argues that forests offer a uniquely productive lens for comparing how colonialism and capitalism transformed environments across time and place. Rather than proposing timber colonialism as a rival analytical framework to extractivism, the introduction treats the two as complementary: extractivism describes what happened to the forests, while timber colonialism describes what happened to the people. The ecological complexity of forests, their long temporality, their coincidence with Indigenous territories, and the multiple cycles of extraction they undergo make them unusually revealing sites for understanding colonial power. The eight papers in this collection span overlapping extractive frontiers in Algonquin Park, judicial dispossession in northern Scandinavia, internal colonialism in Russia’s European North, ecological substitution in southern Brazil, the colonial imaginary in Labrador and Sierra Leone, failed colonialism in Sheet’ka (Alaska), and capitalist deforestation without colonialism in Poland. Across these cases, labour regimes, property systems, and the material properties of timber itself shaped whether extraction materialized or failed, and whether colonial frameworks persisted beyond the colonial period. Together, the papers demonstrate that colonial relationships to forests produce dispossession whether or not the trees come down.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2026. Vol. 92, p. A1-A6
Keywords [en]
Deforestation, Environmental history, Extractivism, Forests, Ghost acres, Settler colonialism, Timber colonialism
National Category
History
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-257410DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2026.04.005ISI: 001797654900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105040090472OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-257410DiVA, id: diva2:2082032
Available from: 2026-06-30 Created: 2026-06-30 Last updated: 2026-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lučić, Iva
By organisation
Department of History
In the same journal
Journal of Historical Geography
History

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 10 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf