Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessing enzyme stability for biocatalysis
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Industrial Biotechnology, Industrial Biotechnology. Bioprocess Engineering and Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1507-4323
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Industrial Biotechnology, Industrial Biotechnology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9577-832X
2026 (English)In: Biocatalysis and Biotransformation, ISSN 1024-2422, E-ISSN 1029-2446Article, review/survey (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Despite the many advantages of enzymes, their stability remains a significant limitation inbiocatalytic applications. A systematic evaluation of stability is a critical first step towardsdeveloping effective stabilization strategies. enzyme stability can be broadly categorized intothree types: thermodynamic stability, kinetic stability, and operational stability. each categoryoffers distinct insights into enzyme performance. thermodynamic stability reflects the enzyme’sintrinsic tendency to maintain its folded structure under equilibrium conditions. Kinetic stabilityrefers to the rate of irreversible deactivation over time, while operational stability describes theenzyme’s ability to retain catalytic activity under actual process conditions, accounting for allrelevant deactivation mechanisms. this review compiles the key parameters, experimentalmethodologies, and tools to assess each stability type. to this end, we highlight case studies fromthe past decade that demonstrate the absence of a universal approach to evaluating enzymestability and we present examples of Ai- and Ml-driven tools for different types of stabilitypredictions. the specific application should guide the choice of method and metric, whether theobjective is to understand fundamental deactivation mechanisms or to optimize enzymeperformance under industrial conditions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa UK Limited , 2026.
Keywords [en]
thermodynamic stability, kinetic stability, operational stability, experimental methodology, FAiR data
National Category
Biocatalysis and Enzyme Technology
Research subject
Biotechnology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-384088DOI: 10.1080/10242422.2026.2686656ISI: 001797448800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105042301126OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-384088DiVA, id: diva2:2079748
Note

QC 20260701

Available from: 2026-06-25 Created: 2026-06-25 Last updated: 2026-07-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vang Høst, AmalieBerglund, Per
By organisation
Industrial Biotechnology
In the same journal
Biocatalysis and Biotransformation
Biocatalysis and Enzyme Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf