Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Representations of lesson planning practices in primary mathematics teacher education: A mapping review
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Teaching and Learning.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5119-9027
Number of Authors: 32026 (English)In: Review of Education, E-ISSN 2049-6613, Vol. 14, no 2, article id e70174Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To understand and to enact teachers' practices, these practices must be made visible to pre-service teachers, and this happens through representations. This paper focuses on representations in teacher education, and on representation of lesson planning in particular. Lesson planning is a core practice in teachers' work and a critical component of teacher education curricula. However, there is limited knowledge regarding how planning for mathematics teaching is addressed in teacher education, including how representations of teachers' planning practice are used in the teaching of planning. This mapping review aims to identify the types of representations of lesson planning used in mathematics teacher education as these are visible in research on the development of planning skills for mathematics teaching in primary school. Searches were done in ERIC and Scopus for empirical research studies conducted between 2000 and April 2023 and written in English. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 25 publications were included. Representations made visible in the included studies related to both representations of planning as a process and representations of products of planning. The majority of process-focused representations involved joint planning together with teachers or teacher educators, and product-focused representations involved complete lesson plans by more experienced teachers or teacher educators, or written examples of learner activities/tasks, but also some cases of pre-planning. Overall, there were few studies that addressed the representations used, and future research may benefit from making the use of representations more explicit, as well as exploring how different representations might influence pre-service teachers' learning opportunities and understanding.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2026. Vol. 14, no 2, article id e70174
Keywords [en]
lesson planning, primary mathematics teacher education, representation of teaching, teacher education pedagogy
National Category
Educational Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-256922DOI: 10.1002/rev3.70174ISI: 001781087600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105040723958OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-256922DiVA, id: diva2:2078479
Available from: 2026-06-24 Created: 2026-06-24 Last updated: 2026-06-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Erixon, Eva-Lena
By organisation
Department of Teaching and Learning
In the same journal
Review of Education
Educational Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf