Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gräsrotsbyråkraten och den motvillige brukaren: Erfarenheter från en tidig insats med förebyggande skul­drådgivning
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5244-6878
2026 (English)In: Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, ISSN 1104-1420, E-ISSN 2003-5624, Vol. 32, no 3-4Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Over-indebtedness is a societal problem affecting nearly half a million individuals in Sweden, placing them at risk of deteriorating health and well-being. Municipal budget and debt counselling services constitute the only welfare actors that offer preventive support to individuals at risk. Despite this, re­gulations governing preventive debt counselling in the new Social Services Act remain vague, and there is a lack of methodological guidance for how such work should be carried out. This study aims to in­vestigate the conditions for preventive debt counselling within social services by examining a one-year early intervention targeting young adults aged 18–30 with rent arrears. As part of the intervention, at­tempts were made to contact individuals and offer debt counselling. The debt counsellors who imple­mented the intervention were interviewed to explore the conditions that shaped their discretion and co­ping strategies. The results show that the early intervention was affected by resource shortages in rela­tion to the labour-intensive nature of the work, while the regular operations still had to be maintained. Additional challenges included difficulties in establishing contact with the target group, as well as et­hical considerations concerning the balance between the intervention’s potential benefits and its risks for participants—particularly the risk of intrusion of the individual’s autonomy. To manage the discre­pancy between available resources and the intervention’s objectives, the debt counsellors employed the coping strategies of creaming—prioritising the regular client group who were motivated and accessible—and rationalisation—simplifying the legal framework regulating preventive debt counselling. The conclusions discuss the preconditions for preventive debt counselling in light of the study’s findings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2026. Vol. 32, no 3-4
Keywords [en]
debt counseling, early interventions, ethics, focus group interviews, law, preventive work, street-level bureaucracy
National Category
Social Work
Research subject
Social Work; Ethics; Jurisprudence
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-590359DOI: 10.64098/svt.2025.32.54869OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-590359DiVA, id: diva2:2073122
Available from: 2026-06-16 Created: 2026-06-16 Last updated: 2026-06-16

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundholm, MikaelAngelin, AnnaBülow O'Nils, William
By organisation
Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics
In the same journal
Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 25 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf