Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
No home-field advantage in the decomposition of leaf litter in the tropical peat forests of Brunei Darussalam
Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, Singapore.
Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, Singapore; Center for Environmental Sensing and Modelling, Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore, Singapore.
Institute for Biodiversity and Environmental Research, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam.
Brunei Forestry Department, Brunei National Herbarium, Brunei Darussalam, Belait, Brunei Darussalam.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Plant and Soil, ISSN 0032-079X, E-ISSN 1573-5036Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Aims: Tropical peatlands have a globally important role as carbon sinks. How their waterlogged conditions and low nutrient status impact plant litter decomposition is not well-understood, despite decomposition processes underpinning carbon sequestration. Our study explored leaf litter decomposition between adjacent paired patches of intact tropical peat forests and kerangas (free-draining heath) forests in Brunei Darussalam and tested the 'home-field advantage' effect, which predicts that litter decomposes fastest in the environment it was sourced from due to pre-adaption of the decomposer community.

Methods: A litter reciprocal transplantation decomposition experiment was conducted across paired peat and kerangas plots using litter from five tree families (Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Lauraceae, Dipterocarpaceae, and Myrtaceae), common to both forest types.

Results: Contrary to expectations, we found no significant difference in rates of mass or nutrient loss from decomposing litter between peat and kerangas forests irrespective of the litter's origin, despite differences in environmental conditions between the two environments. We also found no evidence for home-field advantage in either forest. Litter nutrient concentration operated as a key predictor of decomposition, but this effect was independent of forest type.

Conclusions: The study suggests that differences in surface leaf litter decomposition are unlikely to greatly contribute to the high organic matter accumulation observed in peat forests relative to kerangas forests, indicating that other factors, such as woody debris, branches and tree trunks are more likely to be contributing to their belowground carbon sequestration. This emphasizes the need for further research to explore factors driving organic matter accumulation in tropical peatlands.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2026.
Keywords [en]
Carbon sequestration, Home-field advantage, Leaf litter decomposition, Litter nutrient concentration, Reciprocal transplant experiment, Tropical peatlands
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-254057DOI: 10.1007/s11104-026-08654-wISI: 001771139100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105039829740OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-254057DiVA, id: diva2:2066251
Available from: 2026-06-04 Created: 2026-06-04 Last updated: 2026-06-04

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wardle, David A.
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Plant and Soil
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 38 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf