Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Systematic Review Identifying Critical Evidence Gaps in Reporting Dietary Change in Randomized Controlled Trials Prescribing Liraglutide, Semaglutide, or Tirzepatide
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Obesity Reviews, ISSN 1467-7881, E-ISSN 1467-789X, Vol. 27, no 6, article id e70077Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

INTRODUCTION: With the growing use of GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist medications, their impact on dietary intake and quality remains unclear. This systematic review examined how randomized controlled trials (RCT) prescribing liraglutide, semaglutide, or tirzepatide assessed and reported dietary intake and quality as outcome measures, alongside weight loss and/or glycemic control, and identified gaps in the use and methodological quality of dietary assessment methods.

METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and CINAHL were systematically searched between January 2008-January 2025 (adults) and January 2014-January 2025 (children/adolescents). The review was registered with the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XPNGY).

RESULTS: Forty-three articles from 41 unique RCTs, comprising 50,690 participants (n = 688 children/adolescents, n = 50,002 adults) were included. Except for two studies targeting adults (one published and one unpublished data from an included study), this review found no other studies that assessed or reported dietary intake or changes in diet. Both reported a reduction in the total energy intake and altered macronutrient distribution in the medication plus diet group, although one was not significantly different from medication alone. Quality of assessment methods used was categorized as "poor" and "acceptable," respectively. These results highlight a critical gap in the literature.

CONCLUSION: Only 2/41 studies (≈5%) reported or assessed dietary intake or evaluated diet changes secondary to GLP-1/GIP RA medication use. This review highlights a major gap in the evidence requiring urgent attention. More high-quality research, using validated dietary assessment methods as outcome measures in RCTs is needed to understand how these medications impact diet and diet quality, nutrient intake, and chronic disease risk.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2026. Vol. 27, no 6, article id e70077
Keywords [en]
diet quality, dietary outcomes, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 agonists, nutrition
National Category
Nutrition and Dietetics
Research subject
Food, Nutrition and Dietetics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-587758DOI: 10.1111/obr.70077ISI: 001654349500001PubMedID: 41491340Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105026700699OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-587758DiVA, id: diva2:2065103
Available from: 2026-06-03 Created: 2026-06-03 Last updated: 2026-06-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Koochek, AfsanehNowicka, Paulina
By organisation
Department of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics
In the same journal
Obesity Reviews
Nutrition and Dietetics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf