Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Examination of a three-tiered RtI-model for identifying and supporting students at risk of reading difficulties in primary schools in Sweden
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Pedagogy and Learning.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1653-6120
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Pedagogy and Learning.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7261-590X
Stockholm University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1502-055x
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2608-6204
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Sustainable development
SDG 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Abstract [en]

Some Swedish schools do not identify and support students with reading difficulties efficiently enough during the first years at school. A longitudinal design was used to examine a three-tiered RtI-model for identifying and supporting students at risk of reading difficulties in a Swedish school context. The results demonstrated that the RtI-model could be successfully applied. The proportion of students in need of support (i.e., below the 25th percentile) was significantly reduced after two years. When comparing students receiving RtI-treatment (n =113) with a group of reference students (n =759), students at-risk of reading difficulties in the RtI-group reached the cut-off of the study (i.e., 25th percentile) to a significantly higher degree in word and non-word decoding and reading comprehension in a short text during the post-test at the end of Grade 2 than students in the reference group. The discussion highlights the RtI-model’s strength - “No Child Left Behind”. 

Keywords [en]
response to intervention (RtI); multitiered system of support (MTSS); reading; at risk; reading difficulties; primary education
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Education, Special Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-112997OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-112997DiVA, id: diva2:1659729
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2017-06039Available from: 2022-05-20 Created: 2022-05-20 Last updated: 2022-06-08Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Response to Intervention - en specialdidaktisk modell för att förebygga lässvårigheter: Från samlat forskningsläge till tillämpning i svensk skolkontext
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Response to Intervention - en specialdidaktisk modell för att förebygga lässvårigheter: Från samlat forskningsläge till tillämpning i svensk skolkontext
2022 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The Response to Intervention model originated in the United States. The model aims to prevent learning difficulties through early identification and thus early intervention. The goal is that no student should fall behind “No child left behind”. The purpose of the thesis is to investigate how RtI can function as a special didactic model in primary school. It seeks to systematically organize early identification and early intervention regarding students' reading development and thereby counteract reading difficulties. The thesis first study is a meta-analysis that examines the effects of tier 2 interventions on primary school students' word decoding development. A small to moderate effect was found g = .31. The second study examined the effects of RtI when identifying and intervening students in need of support in their reading development. The study was conducted as a quasi-experiment with grade 2 students (n = 11 + 11). The results showed effect sizes between g = .49 - 1.00 on word decoding and reading comprehension, however, the results were not significant. The teachers' perception of the model was also compiled. They found that RtI worked very well as the students received support and the teachers were given the opportunity to collaborate. They did however also find that the RtI model was inflexible and resource-intensive. The third study was longitudinal and followed students' (n = 113) reading development during grade 1 and 2 within RtI. A significant reduction in students in need of support was noted. In comparison with a reference group (n = 759), there were significantly fewer students who performed below the 25th percentile and fewer RtI students who did not maintain their reading ability. The results showed that RtI seems to function as a special didactic model in accordance with "No child left behind". Nevertheless, there are students who have received interventions within the model that do not reach age-appropriate levels. The fourth article discusses the possibilities of combining Response to Intervention and Lesson Study as the models seem to be able to complement each other.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Växjö: Linnaeus University Press, 2022. p. 114
Series
Linnaeus University Dissertations ; 452
Keywords
response to intervention (RtI); multitiered system of support (MTSS); reading; at risk; reading difficulties; primary education
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Pedagogics and Educational Sciences, Education
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-113005 (URN)9789189709065 (ISBN)9789189709058 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-06-17, Weber, Universitetsplatsen 1, Växjö, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2017-06039
Available from: 2022-05-25 Created: 2022-05-21 Last updated: 2024-03-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilvius, CamillaFälth, LindaSelenius, HeidiSvensson, Idor
By organisation
Department of Pedagogy and LearningDepartment of Psychology
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 365 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf