Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Logics in play: what 'rules of the game' regulate Swedish PE teachers’ decision-making processes?
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5291-1549
2023 (English)In: Sport, Education and Society, ISSN 1357-3322, E-ISSN 1470-1243, Vol. 28, no 7, p. 842-854Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research suggests that physical education (PE) needs to adapt to meet societies’ changing needs and increased diversity amongst pupils. However, despite growing pressure from often competing sectoral interests, educational reforms, and new curricula directed at PE to bring about such changes, research has not seen a more profound impact. Many policy initiatives often impact PE teachers, which means they are responsible for implementing desired changes. Therefore, it is somewhat surprising how research has paid limited attention to PE teachers’ decision-making processes regarding the envisaged change. To address this shortfall of understanding, this study’s aim is to explore PE teachers’ decision-making processes and how they relate to external pressures, interests, and reforms. To meet this aim, this article draws on an institutional logics perspective and uses data collected from semi-structured interviews with 16 PE teachers. Findings show how four institutional logics guide PE teachers’ decision-making processes: (a) a democracy logic, (b) an investment logic, (c) a professional logic, and (d) a bureaucracy logic. The results also show that, beyond the fact that logics legitimise certain decisions, they delegitimise other decisions, which requires PE teachers to navigate between logics in their decision-making processes. This navigating process requires PE teachers to handle multiple and incompatible ideas about what good PE is and how to conduct it. This knowledge, if utilised, can increase alignment between policy content and implementers’ interpretations, which may mitigate resistance to policy reforms and stimulate intended implementation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2023. Vol. 28, no 7, p. 842-854
Keywords [en]
Organisational change, institutional analysis, policy reform, PE teacher interpretation, institutional logics, physical education
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-194519DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2022.2071254ISI: 000790722200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85132675597OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-194519DiVA, id: diva2:1656922
Available from: 2022-05-09 Created: 2022-05-09 Last updated: 2026-02-11Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. A school subject under pressure: understanding the changing means and ends of Swedish physical education and health
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A school subject under pressure: understanding the changing means and ends of Swedish physical education and health
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis is concerned with exploring changes in the organization of Swedish PE, seeking to understand why certain aspects of the subject undergo alterations while others remain relatively stable. Central to this exploration is grasping the ends outlined for PE and the means employed to attain them. The ongoing debate surrounding the need for change in PE has placed the subject in a vulnerable position, susceptible to influence from various interest groups, and more likely to change according to their demands. Despite existing research focusing on various aspects of change within the subject, there remains a gap in knowledge concerning how underlying ideas regarding the purpose and realization of PE are incorporated into its means and ends. Therefore, this thesis aims to understand how shared ideas of appropriate practices in PE contribute to altered or retained organizational principles, with potential consequences for how education is realized. Employing institutional theory, the first research question examines how the research field of PE shapes legitimacy in practice, by identifying 15 dominant research topics. The second research question seeks to understand PE teachers’ actions within a broader societal context. This exploration demonstrates how four institutional logics guide PE teachers’ decision-making processes. In relation to the third research question, an institutional work perspective sheds light on processes driving certain actions towards change. Through interviews with school leaders, the results highlight four types of institutional work employed as they navigate government-initiated policy. The fourth and final research question delves into how PE teachers navigate the diverse institutional pressures affecting both symbolic and material conditions for implementing change. Employing an institutional logics perspective, the findings show that PE teachers respond to the various pressures in four different ways. The discussion scrutinizes how the actions of organizational members influence institutional structures and vice versa, enabling both change and stability within PE.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå University, 2024. p. 118
Series
Akademiska avhandlingar vid Pedagogiska institutionen, Umeå universitet, ISSN 0281-6768 ; 134
Keywords
Physical education, organizational institutionalism, institutional logics, institutional work, organizational change, policy implementation
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
education
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-223762 (URN)978-91-8070-370-3 (ISBN)978-91-8070-369-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-05-24, Hörsal F, Hum.D.220 - Hjortronlandet, Humanisthuset, Umeå, 10:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-05-03 Created: 2024-04-25 Last updated: 2024-05-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1366 kB)128 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1366 kBChecksum SHA-512
776c84febd5e06f276024c3acc8fa973ff23ef1f334937e9452cd19c6913098c15aca520d8c72a9648cbbc10028b97a34f20d9e1b3761fa1a28e61c45d6a3a9c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindkvist, Louise
By organisation
Department of Education
In the same journal
Sport, Education and Society
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 191 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 523 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf