Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Epidemiology, classification, treatment, and mortality of adult femoral neck and basicervical fractures: an observational study of 40,049 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4615-7276
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, E-ISSN 1749-799X, Vol. 16, no 1, article id 561Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Although femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are common in orthopedic departments, optimal treatment methods remain in dispute. There are few large nationwide studies, including basicervical FNFs (bFNFs), on epidemiology, treatment, and mortality. This nationwide study aims to describe the epidemiology, fracture classification, current treatment regimens, and mortality of undisplaced and minimally displaced (Garden I–II, uFNF), displaced (Garden III–IV, dFNF) and bFNFs in adults.

Methods: All FNFs, including bFNFs with a registered injury date between 1 April 2012 and 31 December 2020, were included in this observational study from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR). Data on age, sex, injury mechanism, fracture classification, primary treatment, and seasonal variation were analyzed.

Results: Some 40,049 FNFs were registered in the SFR. The mean age of the patients in the register was 80.3 (SD 11) years and 63.8% (25,567) were female. Of all FNFs, 25.0% (10,033) were uFNFs, 63.4% (25,383) dFNFs, and 11.6% (4,633) bFNFs. Non-surgical treatment was performed in 0.6% (261) of the patients. Internal fixation (IF) (84.7%) was the main treatment for uFNFs and arthroplasty (87.3%) for dFNFs. For bFNFs, IF (43.8%) and hip arthroplasty (45.9%) were performed equally often. Of the 33,105 patients with a 1-year follow-up mortality at 1-year was 20.6% for uFNF, 24.3% for dFNF, and 25.4% for bFNF.

Conclusion: The main treatment of uFNFs is IF with screws or pins. Hip arthroplasty is the predominant treatment for dFNF. bFNF are more common than previously reported and treated with IF or arthroplasty, depending on patient age. These results may help health care providers, researchers and clinicians better understand the panorama of FNFs in Sweden.

Level of Evidence: IV, retrospective cohort study.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2021. Vol. 16, no 1, article id 561
National Category
Orthopaedics
Research subject
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-187758DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02701-1ISI: 000696246600004PubMedID: 34526047Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85115091873OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-187758DiVA, id: diva2:1595924
Available from: 2021-09-21 Created: 2021-09-21 Last updated: 2024-11-11Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Minimally displaced and basicervical femoral neck fractures: treatment and outcome
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Minimally displaced and basicervical femoral neck fractures: treatment and outcome
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Minimalt dislocerade och basocervikala lårbenshalsfrakturer : behandling och utfall
Abstract [en]

Although femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are common injuries, optimal treatment methods have not yet been established. FNFs disproportionately affect the ageing population and are associated with high disability and mortality. Since Garden’s classification was introduced in 1961, hip arthroplasty has emerged as the preferred method for treating displaced FNFs in older patients. However, for undisplaced or minimally displaced FNFs, internal fixation has been the prevailing treatment option, regardless of biological age and activity. Reoperation rates after internal fixation have been reported, ranging from 8% to 19%. Reducing treatment failures and subsequent re-operations is of clinical significance to improve care for this vulnerable patient population. Several treatment options, such as internal fixation and arthroplasty, have been proposed to manage basicervical FNFs. However, the number of available reports on clinical outcomes is limited.

Paper 1 is a register-based observational cohort study of the panorama of FNFs in Sweden based on data from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR), allowing us to include a large number of FNFs for analysis. Data on age, sex, seasonal variation, trauma mechanism and location, fracture type, treatment and mortality are presented.

Paper 2 is an observational cohort study based on data from the SFR. All basicervical FNFs between 2011 and 2020 and entered into SFR at the participating sites (Sunderbyn, Umeå, Östersund, Karlstad, Uppsala and Göteborg) were screened. A review of radiographs and medical records was performed. We found basicervical FNFs to be difficult to classify accurately. Furthermore, undisplaced basicervical FNFs have a low re-operation rate when treated with internal fixation compared to displaced basicervical FNFs.

Paper 3 is an observational cohort study based on data from three centres (Umeå, Skellefteå and Danderyd) with a consecutive series of undisplaced FNFs treated with internal fixation. This study investigated the association between dorsal and anterior tilt on the lateral radiograph and the outcome after internal fixation. We found that dorsal tilt >20° and anterior tilt >10° increased the risk of treatment failure.

Paper 4 is an observational cohort study based on data from the SFR. We identified a cohort of stress-induced FNFs and reviewed patient medical records to verify a correct diagnosis and identify treatment failures. The study sought to depict the panorama of stress-induced FNFs and document instances of treatment failures. We found low mortality rates, a biphasic age distribution and a large proportion of displaced FNFs.

Paper 5 is a case series of 93 occult FNFs treated with internal fixation. A consecutive series of occult FNFs from four centres were included (Umeå, Skellefteå, Danderyd, Malmö). The treatment failure rate after internal fixation was analysed, and it was shown that 6% led to treatment failure.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå University, 2024. p. 101
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 2327
Keywords
Trauma, hip fracture, femoral neck fracture, stress-fracture, basi-cervical fracture, treatment, outcome
National Category
Orthopaedics
Research subject
Medicine; Orthopaedics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-231676 (URN)978-91-8070-505-9 (ISBN)978-91-8070-506-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-12-06, Bergasalen, Södra Entrén, Norrlands Universitetssjukhus, Umeå, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-11-15 Created: 2024-11-11 Last updated: 2024-11-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1234 kB)216 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1234 kBChecksum SHA-512
65c96ba6c2ce160d2bc02742f9b0ab6a3d6b124b98475ca94231d82b7569711e5be8c70a2e5ab1e39c70c020c6692a85220461b7eaf7a9b306e5b0fe77d23e5d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sundkvist, JonasMukka, Sebastian
By organisation
Orthopaedics
In the same journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 218 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 568 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf