Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Did App Privacy Improve After the GDPR?
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Mathematics and Computer Science (from 2013). (PriSec)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5235-5335
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Mathematics and Computer Science (from 2013).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0418-4121
2019 (English)In: IEEE Security and Privacy, ISSN 1540-7993, E-ISSN 1558-4046, Vol. 17, no 6, p. 10-20Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this article, we present an analysis of app behavior before and after the regulatory change in dataprotection in Europe. Our data shows that app privacy has moderately improved after the implementationof the General Data Protection Regulation.

In May 2018, stronger regulation of the processingof personal data became law in the EuropeanUnion, known as the General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR).1 The expected effect of the regulation was betterprotection of personal data, increased transparencyof collection and processing, and stronger interventionrights of data subjects, with some authors claiming thatthe GDPR would change the world, or at least that ofdata protection regulation.2 The GDPR had a two-year(2016–2018) implementation period that followedfour years of preparation. At the time of this writing,in November 2019, one and one-half years have passedsince the implementation of GDPR.Has the GDPR had an effect on consumer software?Has the world of code changed too? Did theGDPR have a measurable effect on mobile apps’behavior? How should such a change in behavior bemeasured?In our study, we decided to use two indicators for measurement:Android dangerous permission16 privileges anduser feedback from the Google Play app market. We collecteddata from smartphones with an installed app set formonths before GDPR implementation on 25 May 2018and months after that date.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE, 2019. Vol. 17, no 6, p. 10-20
Keywords [en]
privay, gdpr, apps, smartphones, personal data access, survey
National Category
Computer Sciences
Research subject
Computer Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-75508DOI: 10.1109/MSEC.2019.2938445ISI: 000494416500003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-75508DiVA, id: diva2:1367339
Projects
AlertPrivacy&UsAvailable from: 2019-11-03 Created: 2019-11-03 Last updated: 2026-02-12Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Measuring Apps' Privacy-Friendliness: Introducing transparency to apps' data access behavior
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Measuring Apps' Privacy-Friendliness: Introducing transparency to apps' data access behavior
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Mobile apps brought unprecedented convenience to everyday life, and nowadays, hardly any interactive service exists without having an interface through an app. The rich functionalities of apps rely on the pervasive capabilities of the mobile device, such as its cameras and other types of sensors. Consequently, apps generate a diverse and large amount of data, which can often be deemed as privacy-sensitive data. As the mobile device is also equipped with several means to transmit the collected data, such as WiFi and 4G, it brings further concerns about individuals' privacy.

Even though mobile operating systems use access control mechanisms to guard system resources and sensors, apps exercise their granted privileges in an opaque manner. Depending on the type of privilege, apps require explicit approval from the user in order to acquire access to them through permissions. Nonetheless, granting permission does not put constraints on the access frequency. Granted privileges allow the app to access users' personal data for a long period of time, typically until the user explicitly revokes the access. Furthermore, available control tools lack monitoring features, and therefore, the user faces hindrances to comprehend the magnitude of personal data access. Such circumstances can erode intervenability from the interface of the phone, lead to incomprehensible handling of personal data, and thus, create privacy risks for the user.

This thesis covers a long-term investigation of apps' data access behavior and makes an effort to shed light on various privacy implications. It also shows that app behavior analysis yields information that has the potential to increase transparency, to enhance privacy protection, to raise awareness regarding consequences of data disclosure, and to assist the user in informed decision-making while selecting apps or services. We introduce models, methods, and demonstrate the data disclosure risks with experimental results. Finally, we show how to communicate privacy risks through the user interface by taking the results of app behavior analyses into account.

Abstract [en]

Mobile apps brought unprecedented convenience to everyday life, and nowadays, hardly any interactive service exists without having an interface through an app. The rich functionalities of apps rely on the pervasive capabilities of the mobile device. Consequently, apps generate a diverse and large amount of data, which can often be deemed as privacy-sensitive data.

Even though mobile operating systems use access control mechanisms to guard system resources and sensors, apps exercise their granted privileges in an opaque manner. Furthermore, available control tools lack monitoring features, and therefore, the user faces hindrances to comprehend the magnitude of personal data access.

This thesis covers a long-term investigation of apps' data access behavior and makes an effort to shed light on various privacy implications. It also shows that app behavior analysis yields information that has the potential to increase transparency, to enhance privacy protection, to raise awareness regarding consequences of data disclosure, and to assist the user in informed decision-making while selecting apps or services.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlstads universitet, 2020. p. 218
Series
Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2020:24
Keywords
Mobile Apps, User data, Transparency, Privacy, Data protection
National Category
Computer Sciences
Research subject
Computer Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-79308 (URN)978-91-7867-132-8 (ISBN)978-91-7867-137-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-10-09, 9C203, Universitetsgatan 2, Karlstad, 09:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2020-09-09 Created: 2020-08-11 Last updated: 2026-02-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(592 kB)1677 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT03.pdfFile size 592 kBChecksum SHA-512
677debcce97666f7d2dd51885b402721442c8fff11ee721707bdd7429c5a9131ca12e23efaf3e3d47a9d452a70bb57098ecd702729770ab198143d2efcf60bda
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Momen, NurulFritsch, Lothar
By organisation
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science (from 2013)
In the same journal
IEEE Security and Privacy
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1697 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 5352 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf