In this thesis, the performance of two over-sampling techniques, SMOTE and ADASYN, is compared. The comparison is done on three imbalanced data sets using three different classification models and evaluation metrics, while varying the way the data is pre-processed. The results show that both SMOTE and ADASYN improve the performance of the classifiers in most cases. It is also found that SVM in conjunction with SMOTE performs better than with ADASYN as the degree of class imbalance increases. Furthermore, both SMOTE and ADASYN increase the relative performance of the Random forest as the degree of class imbalance grows. However, no pre-processing method consistently outperforms the other in its contribution to better performance as the degree of class imbalance varies.