Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gender Equality and Media Regulation Study: Zimbabwe
(FOJO)
2022 (English)Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
Sustainable development
SDG 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls, SDG 16: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

This research has used the triangle approach of assessing content of laws and policies, institutional framework of regulatory bodies and the traditions and practice within media houses and media training institutions. Specifically, research gathered data on media in gender equality laws; gender in media and other laws; national and self-regulatory bodies; and gender policies in media houses, media-based civil society organisations and media training institutions.

While Zimbabwe’s legislative and regulatory framework on gender equality is strong on paper, this has not been effectively utilised to inform the content of enacted media laws and policies whose language is generic.

This study acknowledges that the implementation of principles around gender equality and women empowerment in general, is low and there is lack of accountability to the constitution including by most of the non-gender regulatory bodies. This has resulted in media policies, structures and content decidedly remaining static or regressing at the expense of women as media workers, as consumers of media products and as citizens. While the media demands constitutional accountability from other stakeholders in socio-economic and political spheres, it has not held itself to those same standards.

Weak media regulation around gender issues and content goes against the letter and spirit of Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR), as well as other continental and international instruments that guarantee freedom of expression and access to information.

Recommendations for media development agencies working to advance gender equality and freedom of expression for women and marginalised groups therefore include: a prerequisite to recognise equality and equity as a principle; mainstreaming gender for transformation of media landscape; effective accountability by media to constitutional guarantees; a multi-sectoral approach to facilitating the full enjoyment of rights; equal representation in media decision-making; mandatory gender sensitisation training to transform knowledge, attitudes, and practices in service delivery; development and adoption of a sector wide code of conduct to ensure gender integration in content, structure, and culture; integration of gender as a critical component of media training institutions; ongoing sensitisation for media service providers on how they can articulate issues without perpetuating stereotypes about women and youths; increased financial, material and technical support to those media houses committed to gender integration in practices beyond developing gender policies and gender action plans, and committed to implementation and monitoring and evaluation of accountability to the constitutional benchmarks; and support should include recognition of and awards for gender champions - male and female, to encourage best practices.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Kalmar, Sweden: Fojo Media Institute , 2022. , p. 26
National Category
Gender Studies Media Studies
Research subject
Social Sciences, Gender Studies; Media Studies and Journalism
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-117973OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-117973DiVA, id: diva2:1734303
Note

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed in this report are solely those of the authors. They do not claim to reflect the opinions or views of Fojo Media Institute, or any of the research study’s funding partners.

Available from: 2023-02-06 Created: 2023-02-06 Last updated: 2023-02-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Gender equality and media regulation study(4191 kB)1590 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4191 kBChecksum SHA-512
b6ef3b7bc710c255c24570a149e3627e3dc708a195492546970d3b3cd39cd64d8c515ed7d4396cbe0f0627d55ca4c4a2b5eb37545457feafa1d29f43f0b8a1d5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Gender StudiesMedia Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1590 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 316 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf