Change search
Refine search result
1234 51 - 100 of 187
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the 'Create feeds' function.
  • 51.
    Ekengren, Magnus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    EU:s säkerhetspolitiska roll: från säkerhetsgemenskap till säker gemenskap2010In: Kungl Krigsvetenskapsakademiens Handlingar och Tidskrift, ISSN 0023-5369, no Nr 2, 11-20 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 52.
    Ekengren, Magnus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Extending experimentalist governance in crisis management2015In: Extending experimentalist governance – the EU and Transnational Regulation / [ed] Jonathan Zeitlin, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 267-294 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 53.
    Ekengren, Magnus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    From a European Security Community to a Secure European  Community: Tracing the New the Security Identity of the EU2008In: Globalization and Environmental Challen­ges: Reconceptualising Security in the 21st Century / [ed] Brauch, H.G. et. al., Berlin: Springer-Verlag , 2008, 695-704 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 54.
    Ekengren, Magnus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    La Politique Européenne de Sécurité et de Défense: de la communauté de sécurité européenne à la communauté européenne sûre2009In: Quatre siècles de coopération militaire franco-suédoise = Svenskt-franskt militärt samarbete under fyra sekler: actes des journées d'études franco-suédoises organisées à Stockholm les 25 et 26 octobre 2005 et à Vincennes les 7 et 8 décembre 2006 = svenskt-franskt seminarium organiserad i Stockholm 25 och 26 oktober 2005 och i Vincennes 7 och 8 december 2006 / [ed] G. Åselius et Valérie Caniart, Paris et Stockholm.: .Service historique de la Défense et Försvarshögskolan , 2009, 159-168 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 55.
    Ekengren, Magnus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    The challenge of a broadening security agenda for EU security sector reform2010In: The Politics of Security Sector Reform: Challenges and Opportunities for the European Union’s Global Role / [ed] M. Ekengren and G. Simons, Farnham: Ashgate, 2010Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 56.
    Ekengren, Magnus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    What Can EU Civil Security Governance Learn from the Common Security and Defence Policy and the European Defence Agency?2015In: EU Civil Security Governance: Diversity and cooperation in crisis and disaster management / [ed] H. Hegemann and R. Bossong, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, 233-254 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 57.
    Ekengren, Magnus
    et al.
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Simons, GregSwedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), CRISMART (National Center for Crisis Management Research and Training).
    The Politics of Security Sector Reform: Challenges and Opportunities for the European Union’s Global Role2011Collection (editor) (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Security Sector Reform (SSR) is increasingly becoming a cornerstone in international security and development cooperation. Indeed, the concept has often been seen as a panacea for many of the biggest threats to the world such as failed states, terrorism and poverty. In particular, this book focuses on the complexities of implementation of SSR across the globe and the actual and potential role for the European Union (EU) to play in SSR. As suggested in the title of the book, this involves not only opportunities, but challenges to be overcome as well. There are three core themes to this book: Policy, Policies and Practice. By presenting the themes in this particular order, a greater appreciation of the influences on the process of SSR, from conception to implementation, is relayed to the reader. This volume appeals to audiences interested in the EU as a global actor and the interrelationships between foreign, security, defence and development policies.

  • 58.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Alex Prichard, 2013. Justice, Order and Anarchy: The International Political Theory of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. London:Routledge, 20132013In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, Vol. 115, no 4, 263-266 p.Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 59.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security and Strategic Studies (ISS), Political Science Section.
    Après le non-alignement2009In: Nordiques, ISSN 1761-7677, Vol. 19, no 2, 1-17 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 60.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Begrepp, teori, analysinstrument2015In: Svensk säkerhetspolitik i Europa och Sverige / [ed] Kjell Engelbrekt, Arita Holmberg och Jan Ångström, Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik AB, 2015, 2., [utök.] uppl., 19-34 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 61.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Den nya säkerhetspolitiken och dess betingelser2015In: Svensk säkerhetspolitik i Europa och världen / [ed] Kjell Engelbrekt, Arita Holmberg och Jan Ångström, Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik AB, 2015, 2., [utök.] uppl., 9-18 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 62.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Den "återställda" dialogen USA-Ryssland: multilateral diplomati i OSSE och FN:s Säkerhetsråd 2009-20112013In: Internasjonal Politikk, ISSN 0020-577X, Vol. 71, no 4, 531-558 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [sv]

    Det är allmänt bekant att den amerikansk-ryska dialogen «återställdes» 2009 under presidenterna Obama och Medvedev men tveksamt huruvida denna symbolpolitiska utfästelse även skapade förutsättningar för bättre, eller närmare, mellanstatliga relationer. I det följande företas en analys av återverkningar av de signaler om förnyat samarbete som sänts av respektive politisk ledning inom multilaterala fora där både USA och Ryssland deltar, med särskild tonvikt på Organisationen för Säkerhet och Samarbete i Europa (OSSE) och FN:s Säkerhetsråd. Det övergripande intrycket är att amerikansk-rysk diplomatisk samverkan 2009–2011 förblev fortsatt begränsad, i några spörsmål mer fokuserad, men att man från båda sidor medvetet undvek att «störa» varandras prioriterade intressen. En specifik iakttagelse från OSSE-samarbetet är att Rysslands diplomatiska initiativ var bättre underbyggda än tidigare, och kan förväntas få starkare genomslag i framtiden, åtminstone på det europiska fastlandet. Till skillnad från USA, som handlar via Säkerhetsrådet när man tror sig kunna skapa en koalition för ett visst ändamål, var rysk FN-diplomati 2009–2011 alltjämt defensiv.

  • 63.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security and Strategic Studies (ISS), Political Science Section.
    Efter alliansfriheten2008In: Kungl Krigsvetenskapsakademiens Handlingar och Tidskrift, ISSN 0023-5369, Kungliga Krigsvetenskapsakademiens handlingar och tidskrift, Vol. 212, no 6, 49-66 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 64.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    ”En kapplöpning utan like”: En analytisk PM inför det amerikanska presidentvalet den 8:e november 20162016Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The 2016 American presidential election has been described as ‘a race like no other’, with reference to the tone and nature of the campaign and the stark contrast between the policy platforms of the two main contenders, as well as the unusually high stakes involved for America, the transatlantic link, and beyond. The analysis contained in this memorandum discusses the foreign, security and defense policy platforms of Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump, the leadership styles of the two main candidates, and their respective approaches to transnational alliances and partnerships. In each of three areas of comparison Clinton emerges as the markedly more predictable, more competent and better prepared contender, also reassuringly focused on strengthening ties to close allies and partners in the coming years. From the vantage point of the global order, international trade, security and stability in Europe and the Baltic Sea region, Sweden is therefore significantly more likely to benefit from a Clinton presidency than from an administration led by Trump, and might even be in a position to forge closer ties to the United States in the realm of foreign, security and defense policy following a victory for the Democratic Party candidate on 8 November.

  • 65.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    High-Table Diplomacy: the Reshaping of International Security Institutions2016Book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The proliferation of "minilateral" summits is reshaping how international security problems are addressed, yet these summits remain a poorly understood phenomenon. In this groundbreaking work, Kjell Engelbrekt contrasts the most important minilateral summits -- the G7 (formerly G8) and G20 -- with the older and more formal UN Security Council to assess where the diplomacy of international security is taking place and whether these institutions complement or compete with each other. Engelbrekt's research in primary-source documents of the G7, G8, G20, and UN Security Council provides unique insight into how these institutions deliberate on three policy areas: conflict management, counterterrorism cooperation, and climate change mitigation. Relatively informal and flexible, GX diplomacy invites more countries to take a seat at the table and allows nontraditional security threats to be placed on the agenda. Engelbrekt concludes, however, that there is a continuing need for institutions like the UN to address traditional security problems. High-Table Diplomacy will provoke discussion and further research on the role of minilateral summits among scholars of international relations, security studies, and international organizations.

  • 66.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Minilateralism Matters More?: Exploring Opportunities to End Climate Negotiations Gridlock2015In: Global Affairs, ISSN 2334-0460, E-ISSN 2334-0479, Vol. 1, no 4-5, 399-410 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Multilateral negotiations to reach a universal, binding international agreement on measures that curb greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have repeatedly failed since a scientific consensus on global warming formed in the late 1970s. The 1997 Kyoto Protocol was famously never ratified by the United States, the biggest emitter, and the 2009 Copenhagen conference only produced a narrow deal between the USA, China, India, Brazil and South Africa. Numerous attempts to involve international financial institutions or the G7/G8 have also been unsuccessful. Given the present crisis of multilateralism it can be argued that the time is ripe to engage fully in minilateral climate diplomacy, conferring ownership of the process to the main stakeholders. An informally orchestrated, minilateral diplomacy based on rationalist insights from conventional game and negotiation theory would then sway polluters to press ahead with measures that mitigate and adapt to the anticipated repercussions of climate change. Only after a political deal has been struck between major stakeholders may opportunities arise for ex post authorization and agenda control mechanisms involving the wider international community.

  • 67.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Mission Creep?: The Nontraditional Security Agenda of the G7/8 and the Nascent Role of the G202015In: Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, ISSN 1075-2846, E-ISSN 1942-6720, Vol. 21, no 4, 537-556 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In 2008–2011, the Group of 20 swiftly eclipsed the Group of 7, created in themid-1970s as an informal mechanism for stabilizing markets and facilitatingtransnational currency exchange and investment. Several observers have expressedthe view that the former, broader group is also destined to appropriatethe role of the Group of 8, the G7’s pioneering successor in the realmof nontraditional security. This article examines the G7/8 legacy of forgingquasi-permanent institutional arrangements and frameworks in this policyarea and goes on to gauge nontraditional security initiatives subsequentlylaunched by the G-20. Having juxtaposed the past record of these bodiesand analyzed the interests and power dynamics that influence member stateaction in the short and long term, the article outlines three basic options forhow the relationship between the G-20 and the G7/8 may evolve.

  • 68.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Responsibility Shirking at the United Nations Security Council: Constraints, Frustrations, Remedies2015In: Global Policy, ISSN 1758-5880, E-ISSN 1758-5899, Vol. 6, no 4, 369-378 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The United Nations Security Council is the primary international body in charge of upholding international peace andsecurity. Permanent and nonpermanent member states share in the responsibility to avert great power conflicts andthwart asymmetric disputes, regional instability and civil war, but the former task has priority and the prerogatives andtherefore the obligations of the five permanent member states widely exceed those of countries that hold two-yearelected seats. The bifurcation of roles nevertheless produces ‘responsibility shirking’, which weakens Council perfor-mance on the latter type of tasks. This article suggests that responsibility shirking is underreported in the literatureeven though it is well known to diplomatic practitioners. It considers three types of remedies to the situation, arguingthat amendments to the UN Charter or the Provisional Rules of Procedure are unlikely, but that piecemeal and prag-matic reform could precipitate a change of mindset. In particular, allowing nonpermanent member states to co-chairthe drafting of resolutions is likely to engage all member states in the core business of the Council.

  • 69.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Svensk Afghanistaninsats satt i sitt sammanhang - ännu en förtjänstfull granskning av Agrell: Recension av Wilhelm Agrell, Ett krig här och nu: från svensk fredsoperation till upprorsbekämpning i Afghanistan 2001-20142013In: Militärhistorisk Tidskrift, ISSN 0283-8400Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 70.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security and Strategic Studies (ISS), Political Science Section.
    The Impact of Enlargement on Institutional Integrity in Central and Eastern Europe2009In: Perspectives on European Politics and Society, ISSN 1570-5854, E-ISSN 1568-0258, Vol. 10, no 2, 167-180 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 71.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    The Missing Link in the EU's Nascent Strategic Approach toward Asia: Military Diplomacy2012In: Asia-Pacific review, ISSN 1343-9006, E-ISSN 1469-2937, Vol. 19, no 2, 62-84 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The Lisbon Treaty enacted in 2009 allows the European Union (EU) to adopt a foreign, security, and defense policy with a higher profile. In particular, the High Representative and the European External Action Service are now in a position to conduct a continuous conversation with China, India, Japan, and ASEAN beyond trade-oriented dialogues. But a genuine strategic approach toward Asia requires military expertise so as to adequately assess how to best contribute to stability in this part of the world. Military diplomacy involving individual member states already takes place, yet virtually no information is shared at the EU level. The adoption of a full-fledged strategic approach toward Asia would not only be politically astute and make excellent economic sense; it can also consolidate EU institutions in the realm of foreign, security and defense policy.

  • 72.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    USA:s ombalansering mot Asien och Stilla havet: en preliminär utvärdering2013In: Kungl Krigsvetenskapsakademiens Handlingar och Tidskrift, ISSN 0023-5369, Vol. 217, no 2, 135-155 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 73.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    What Carl Schmitt Picked Up in Weber’s Seminar: A Historical Controversy Revisited2009In: The European Legacy, ISSN 1084-8770, E-ISSN 1470-1316, Vol. 14, no 6, 667-684 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 74.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Why Libya?: Security Council Resolution 1973 and the Politics of Justification2014In: The NATO Intervention in Libya: Lessons Learned from the Campaign / [ed] Kjell Engelbrekt, Charlotte Wagnsson & Marcus Mohlin, London: Routledge, 2014, 41-62 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 75.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    et al.
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Hallenberg, JanSwedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    The European Union and Strategy: an Emerging Actor2008Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 76.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    et al.
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Holmberg, AritaSwedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.Ångström, JanSwedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Division of Strategy.
    Svensk säkerhetspolitik i Europa och världen2015Collection (editor) (Refereed)
    Abstract [sv]

    Vad betyder det svenska medlemskapet i den Europeiska Unionen för svensk säkerhets- och försvarspolitik? I vad består och vem bedriver svensk säkerhetspolitik idag? Vilka former tar sig svensk säkerhetspolitik? Vilka beröringspunkter finns med andra politikområden? Vad betyder det nordiska samarbetet? Frågorna ställs i den reviderade andra upplagan av "Svensk säkerhetspolitik i Europa och världen" och analyseras utifrån en rad olika perspektiv; från teoretiska till praktiska, från militära till civila och från beslut till implementering.

  • 77.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    et al.
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Holmberg, Arita
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Ångström, Jan
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Division of Strategy.
    Svensk säkerhetspolitik i omdaning2015In: Svensk säkerhetspolitik i Europa och världen / [ed] Kjell Engelbrekt, Arita Holmberg, Jan Ångström, Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik AB, 2015, 2, 265-277 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 78.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    et al.
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Mohlin, MarcusSwedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Strategiavdelningen med folkrättscentrum.Wagnsson, CharlotteSwedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    The NATO Intervention in Libya: Lessons learned from the campaign2014Collection (editor) (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This book explores ‘lessons learned’ from the military intervention in Libya by examining key aspects of the 2011 NATO campaign. NATO’s intervention in Libya had unique features, rendering it unlikely to serve as a model for action in other situations. There was an explicit UN Security Council mandate to use military force, a strong European commitment to protect Libyan civilians, Arab League political endorsement and American engagement in the critical, initial phase of the air campaign. Although the seven-month intervention stretched NATO’s ammunition stockpiles and political will almost to their respective breaking points, the definitive overthrow of the Gaddafi regime is universally regarded as a major accomplishment. With contributions from a range of key thinkers and analysts in the field, the book first explains the law and politics of the intervention, starting out with deliberations in NATO and at the UN Security Council, both noticeably influenced by the concept of a Responsibility to Protect (R2P). It then goes on to examine a wide set of military and auxiliary measures that governments and defence forces undertook in order to increasingly tilt the balance against the Gaddafi regime and to bring about an end to the conflict, as well as to the intervention proper, while striving to keep the number of NATO and civilian casualties to a minimum. This book will be of interest to students of strategic studies, history and war studies, and IR in general.

  • 79.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    et al.
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Mörkenstam, Ulf
    Stockholms universitet.
    Forskarutbildningen: Att forska är att inte distraheras2016In: Att forska: praktiker och roller inom samhällsvetenskapen / [ed] Linus Hagström, Arita Holmberg, Niklas Bremberg, Stockholm: Carlssons förlag , 2016, 31-53 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 80.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    et al.
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Nygren, BertilSwedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Russia and Europe: Building Bridges, Digging Trenches2010Collection (editor) (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Russian-European political relations have always been problematic and one of the main reasons for this is the different perspectives on even the very basic notions and concepts of political life. With a worldwide recession, the problems as well as the opportunities in Russian-European relations are magnified. While most works on Russian-European, Russian-American and Russian-West relations focus on current policies and explain them from a standard set of explanatory variables, this book penetrates deeper into the structural and ideational differences that tend to bring about misperceptions, miscalculations, misinterpretations and misdeeds in this two-directional relationship. It applies a very broad conceptual framework to analyse differences that are as relevant for Europe and the EU as it is to Russia’s immediate neighbours and, while doing so, identifies the key factors that will dominate Russia-EU ties in the next decade.

  • 81.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    et al.
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Vrieler, Aron
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Är Bundeswehr insatsberedd?: Den tyska försvarsmakten och europeiska säkerhetsutmaningar2016Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The report examines the issue of the deployability abroad of the German Armed Forces, the Bundeswehr, at present and in terms of future-oriented defence reforms. It notes that the Bundeswehr is growing in terms of GDP spending though not yet in numbers, that there are novel ideas about how to further develop German military doctrine toward its use in international military operations within as well as alongside NATO, and that mechanisms for identifying and closing military capability gaps through procurement are coming into place. At the same time, there are a number of industry-related, legal and political constraints in place, some of which appear poised to continue exert influence over the entire sector for years to come. Absent a very conscious effort on the part of the government and the respective ministries and institutions to alter the status quo, especially in conjunction with aggravated security and defence challenges in Germany’s vicinity, it appears unlikely that these modest steps will yield substantive results in the short to mid-term.

  • 82.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    et al.
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Wagnsson, Charlotte
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Introduction2014In: The NATO Intervention in Libya: Lessons from the Campaign / [ed] Kjell Engelbrekt, Charlotte Wagnsson & Marcus Mohlin, London: Routledge, 2014, 1-14 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 83.
    Engelbrekt, Kjell
    et al.
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Watts, John
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Sino-Russian Strategic Collaboration: Still an “Axis of Convenience”?2015Report (Other academic)
  • 84.
    Eriksson, Arita
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Analyzing EU Defence Integration through Problem Definition2008Report (Other academic)
  • 85.
    Eriksson, Arita
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    The EU in global security governance: lessons for conceptual development2008In: European security governance: the European Union in a Westphalian world / [ed] Charlotte Wagnsson, James Sperling & Jan Hallenberg, London: Routledge , 2008Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 86.
    Gustafsson, Karl
    et al.
    Utrikespolitiska institutet.
    Hagström, Linus
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Forskningsproblem: vad står på spel?2016In: Att forska: praktiker och roller inom samhällsvetenskapen, Stockholm: Carlsson Bokförlag, 2016, 96-118 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 87.
    Hagström, Linus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Att normalisera ett land: Japansk utrikes- och säkerhetspolitik2015In: Japan nu: Strömningar och perspektiv, Stockholm: Carlsson Bokförlag, 2015, 2, 209-231 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 88.
    Hagström, Linus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    East Asia's power shift: The flaws and hazards of the debate and how to avoid them2014In: Asian Perspective, ISSN 0258-9184, Vol. 38, no 3, 337-362 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The widespread debate on an East Asian power shift is generally based on the crude notion that power and capability are interchangeable. We critique this view and offer the alternative that power is the capacity of actors and discourses to produce effects— what we call relational and productive power, respectively. We also engage in a reflexive exercise by addressing the productive power of the power-shift debate itself, and emphasize the danger that this debate might enable the kind of realpolitik that it forebodes.

  • 89.
    Hagström, Linus
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Identity Change and Foreign Policy: Japan and its ‘Others’2016Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 90.
    Hagström, Linus
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Identity Politics in Japan’s International Relations2015Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 91.
    Hagström, Linus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Japan anser sig behöva rusta för att kunna försvara freden2014In: Respons, ISSN 2001-2292, no 6, 8-9 p.Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 92.
    Hagström, Linus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Review of Bridging Troubled Waters: China, Japan, and Maritime Order in the East China Sea. By James Manicom2015In: Pacific Affairs, ISSN 0030-851X, Vol. 88, no 3, 681-683 p.Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 93.
    Hagström, Linus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section. Utrikespolitiska institutet.
    Stoltheten kan knäcka japansk pacifism2014In: Svenska dagbladet, ISSN 1101-2412, Vol. 21 juni, 23- p.Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 94.
    Hagström, Linus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section. Utrikespolitiska institutet.
    The "Abnormal" State: Identity, Norm/Exception and Japan2015In: European Journal of International Relations, ISSN 1354-0661, E-ISSN 1460-3713, Vol. 21, no 1, 122-145 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The term ‘abnormal’ has frequently been used to describe post-war Japan. Together with the idea that the country will, or should have to, ‘normalise’ its foreign and security policy, it has been reproduced in both academia and Japanese society. Why is Japan branded as ‘abnormal’, and from where does the desire to ‘normalise’ it come? Drawing on a relational concept of identity, and the distinction between norm and exception, this article argues that the ‘abnormality–normalisation nexus’ can be understood in terms of three identity-producing processes: (1) the process whereby the Japanese Self is socialised in US/‘Western’ norms, ultimately constructing it as an Other in the international system; (2) the process whereby the Japanese Self imagines itself as ‘legitimately exceptional’ (what is called ‘exceptionalisation’), but also ‘illegitimately abnormal’ — both of which are epitomised by Japan’s ‘pacifism’; and (3) the process whereby both the Self’s ‘negative abnormality’ and China/Asia are securitised in attempts to realise a more ‘normal’ (or super-normal) Japanese Self. How Japan is inter subjectively constructed on a scale between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ enables and constrains action. Although Japan has not remilitarised nearly as much in the 2000s as is often claimed, these processes might very well forebode an exceptional decision to become ‘normal’ and therefore more significant steps towards remilitarisation.

  • 95.
    Hagström, Linus
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    The Sino-Japanese battle for soft power: Pitfalls and promises2015In: Global Affairs, ISSN 2334-0460, E-ISSN 2334-0479, Vol. 1, no 2, 129-137 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Beijing and Tokyo are currently involved in a zero-sum battle for soft power. Both governments are actively trying to shape how third party actors understand contested matters in their bilateral relationship. The dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands is the most obvious flashpoint in this ongoing struggle for hearts and minds. A soft power battle might seem like an innocent endeavour, but by entrenching enmity and legitimizing armed conflict, it might actually translate into one where hard power takes centre stage. Indeed, that the dissemination and entrenchment of affective identity narrative make violence seem normal, natural, realistic or perhaps even inevitable is the greatest danger associated with the ongoing Sino-Japanese dispute. However, if both parties were to agree to let the International Court of Justice settle their discord, the islands dispute could provide them with a chance to boost their respective soft power and lay the groundwork for a more peaceful order in East Asia. The article thus argues that the Sino-Japanese soft power battle contains both well-known pitfalls and a less well-known promise.

  • 96.
    Hagström, Linus
    et al.
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Appelgren, Staffan
    Göteborgs universitet.
    Introduktion: Varför Japan?2015In: Japan nu: Strömningar och perspektiv, Stockholm: Carlsson Bokförlag, 2015, 2nd, 15-28 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 97.
    Hagström, Linus
    et al.
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Bremberg, NiklasStockholms universitet och Utrikespolitiska institutet.Holmberg, AritaSwedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Att forska: praktiker och roller inom samhällsvetenskapen2016Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 98.
    Hagström, Linus
    et al.
    Swedish National Defence College, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section. Utrikespolitiska institutet.
    Gustafsson, Karl
    Japan and identity change: Why it matters in International Relations2015In: The Pacific Review, ISSN 0951-2748, E-ISSN 1470-1332, Vol. 28, no 1, 1-22 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Two approaches to identity have been employed to explore issues in Japan's international relations. One views identity as constituted by domestic norms and culture, and as constitutive of interests, which in turn cause behaviour. Proponents view Japan's ‘pacifist’ and ‘antimilitarist’ identity as inherently stable and likely to change only as a result of material factors. In the other approach, ‘Japan’ emerges and changes through processes of differentiation vis-à-vis ‘Others’. Neither ‘domestic’ nor ‘material’ factors can exist outside of such identity constructions. We argue that the second, relational, approach is more theoretically sound, but begs three questions. First, how can different identity constructions in relation to numerous Others be synthesised and understood comprehensively? Second, how can continuity and change be handled in the same relational framework? Third, what is the point of analysing identity in relational terms? This article addresses the first two questions by introducing an analytical framework consisting of three mutually interacting layers of identity construction. Based on the articles in this special issue, we argue that identity entrepreneurs and emotions are particularly likely to contribute to change within this model. We address the third question by stressing common ground with the first approach: identity enables and constrains behaviour. In the case of Japan, changes in identity construction highlighted by the articles in this special issue forebode a political agenda centred on strengthening Japan militarily.

  • 99.
    Hagström, Linus
    et al.
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Gustafsson, Karl
    Utrikespolitiska institutet.
    Japan and identity change: why it matters in international relations2016In: Identity change and foreign policy: Japan and its 'others' / [ed] Linus Hagström, London and New York: Routledge, 2016, 1-22 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 100.
    Hagström, Linus
    et al.
    Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section.
    Hanssen, Ulv
    Freie Universität Berlin, Tyskland.
    The North Korean abduction issue: Emotions, securitisation and the reconstruction of Japanese identity from ‘aggressor’ to ‘victim’ and from ‘pacifist’ to ‘normal’2016In: Identity change and foreign policy: Japan and its 'others' / [ed] Linus Hagström, London and New York: Routledge, 2016, 71-93 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
1234 51 - 100 of 187
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf