We are living in an era where the media landscape is constantly changing and where actors
are forced to make adoptions to survive. In journalism, it has mainly been about the
transition to a more tabloid news content (i.e sensational, personalized and entertaining
content). This paper has aimed to compare how the double murders in Hökensås and
Norrahammar was framed in the two local newspapers Jönköping-Posten and Jmini 2015;
and to investigate whether these portrayals were tabloid or not. To answer this aim, we
conducted a content analysis with media logic dramaturgy as analysis model. The analysis
and discussion has been set against a theoretical background of journalism, tabloidization,
framing theory and media ethics. The result of our analysis can be divided into three parts.
First, Jmini focused on the crime and the offender, while Jönköping-Posten focused on the
investigation. Secondly, Jmini was unilateral in its reporting, unlike Jönköping-Posten, who
featured several perspectives. Thirdly, the two newspapers had great similarities in how they
portrayed the victims who was given a limited space. The results in relation to our theoretical
background showed that the two newspapers had adapted its content to the format. However,
Jmini had made major adjustments, which sometimes contributed to the publicity rules were
breached to the advantage of the media logic dramaturgy. Our conclusion was that this could
be an indication of tabloidization.