Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
Refine search result
1 - 13 of 13
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Ahlgren, Per
    et al.
    Stockholm University, University Library.
    Hinders, Johan
    Stockholm University, University Library.
    Lindelöw, Camilla
    Stockholm University, University Library.
    Parmhed, Sara
    Stockholm University, University Library.
    Swedberg, Per
    Stockholm University, University Library.
    Research Collaboration between Stockholm University and other Swedish Academic Institutions: A Bibliometric Study to Support Decisions on Library Collaboration2015In: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, QQML, ISSN 2241-1925, E-ISSN 2241-1925, no SI, p. 49-60Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Academic libraries collaborate in several ways. For instance, collaboration can concern standards for indexing and statistics, technical solutions or collection development. A question that a given academic library might ask is with which other academic libraries the library should principally collaborate. In this study, we show how bibliometric methods can be used to generate information that can support decision making with regard to the question at stake. We evaluate the amount of research collaboration between Stockholm University and other Swedish academic institutions across five publishing years, and for the whole considered time period, where research collaboration is operationalized as co-publishing. A dataset of publications obtained from Web of Science, where each publication has at least one Stockholm University address, is used in the study. Co-publishing rates, non-fractionalized and fractionalized, across the publishing years and for the whole for period, for Stockholm University and other Swedish academic institutions, are reported. Further, parts of the outcome of the study are visualized in terms of co-publishing networks.

  • 2.
    Francke, Helena
    et al.
    University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT.
    Lindelöw, Camilla
    Kungliga biblioteket.
    Olsson, Lisa
    Stockholms universitet.
    Author Perspectives on Research Visibility and Impact2018In: 23rd Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy 2018: Book of abstracts / [ed] Marco Schirone, Björn Hammarfelt & Gustaf Nelhans, 2018Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The poster will present findings from a survey of 375 corresponding authors whose publications have beenpublished open access as part of the Springer Compact agreement between Bibsam and Springer Nature 2016-2018. In focus is how these authors reason about ways to make their research visible, how/if they themselves tryto track the attention gained by the publication, and what they think are good impact measures. The study thusadds to previous work on author attitudes and practices (e.g. Hammarfelt & Haddow, 2018; Tenopir et al., 2016)and can provide some input into the current work in Sweden on how to evaluate and assure high research quality(UKÄ, 2018).

    When asked about their arguments for publishing open access, a large proportion of respondents in freetextanswers indicated that open access is important because it increases a publication’s visibility, access to it,downloads and/or social and scientific impact. Consequently, it is interesting to investigate if open accesspublishing is the only way in which these authors try to find readers for their publication, or if they take furthersteps. Answers suggest researchers use general social media, academic networking sites, and more traditionaldigital channels to share their publications.

    Furthermore, the study asked which measures the authors think are the best ones for assessing the impactof their publications, and how they themselves find out how much attention their publications get. The responseswill be discussed in terms of traditional metrics, such as JIFs and citations, and altmetrics, such as how documentsare accessed or appraised (Haustein et al., 2016) through downloads or shares in social media. They will also berelated to more indirect forms of research evaluation, such as peer review and social impact.

    References

    Hammarfelt, B. & Haddow, G. (2018). Conflicting measures and values: How humanities scholars in Australia and Swedenuse and react to bibliometric indicators. JASIS&T, 69(7), 924-935.

    Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D. & Costas, R. (2016). Interpreting ‘altmetrics’: Viewing acts on social media through the lensof citation and social theories. In Sugimoto, C. R. (Ed.), Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication (pp. 372-405). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Tenopir, C. et al. (2016). No scholar is an island: The impact of sharing in the work life of scholars. Learned Publishing, 30,5-17.

    UKÄ - Universitetskanslerämbetet (2018). Kvalitetssäkring av forskning: Rapportering av ett regeringsuppdrag. (Report2018:2) Stockholm: Universitetskanslerämbetet.

  • 3.
    Hertil Lindelöw, Camilla
    Stockholm University, University Library.
    Effekter av undervisning i informationskompetens: går de att mäta?2008In: InfoTrend - Nordisk tidskrift för informationsspecialister, ISSN 1653-0225, Vol. 63, no 3, p. 81-84Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Academic libraries have given students instruction in information literacy for a long time. One important aspect of this work is to evaluate the student after instruction; has the student learnt something? Can she or he be defined as information literate? The research about assessment and evaluation in teaching is abundant. This article presents some of the research in this field, with a particular focus on assessing and evaluating teaching in libraries.

    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 4.
    Hertil Lindelöw, Camilla
    Stockholm University, University Library.
    How does assessment affect learning: an example from a chemistry PhD-course in scholarly communication2013In: Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, E-ISSN 1890-5900, Vol. 5, no special issue 1, p. 27-31Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Assessment of students in the learning process may have several reasons (knowledge assessment, ranking etc.). One reason presented in this article would be to use the assessment as a way to enhance learning. At Stockholm University Library, PhD-students in Chemistry annually partake in a library course, where they have to write a mandatory essay and, from 2012, review a fellow student’s essay. Comparing and discussing the former and the new ways of assessing, this article aims to discuss assessment as a way to enhance learning.

    Download full text (pdf)
    LindelöwC
  • 5.
    Lindelöw, Camilla
    Södertörn University, Södertörn University Library.
    Altmetrics - vad kan forskare och lärosätet använda det till?2015Conference paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 6.
    Lindelöw, Camilla
    Södertörn University, Södertörn University Library.
    Can altmetrics data help researchers fine-tune their publication strategies?2017Conference paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
    Download full text (pdf)
    presentation
  • 7.
    Lindelöw, Camilla
    Södertörn University, Södertörn University Library.
    Open Access och prestige2015Conference paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 8.
    Lindelöw, Camilla
    Stockholm University, University Library.
    Open Access-artiklar publicerade vid Stockholms universitet 2012, fördelade på fakulteter och institutioner2013Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
    Download full text (pdf)
    OA_stat_2012
  • 9.
    Lindelöw, Camilla
    Södertörn University, Södertörn University Library.
    Publication patterns, prestige, and Open Access2015Conference paper (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Today, scientific publishing is serious business. Funding bodies and universities demand open access (OA) publishing for several reasons, including reaching a wider audience. Career advancement for individual researchers implies visibility in highly prestigious publication channels. OA publishing and high prestige may be in conflict, but doesn't have to be. Green OA, or parallel publishing, gives the researcher the possibility of fulfilling OA demands while publishing in well known channels with high prestige. Gold OA may present a greater challenge, since these channels are often new, unknown and infested by so called predatory publishers.

    The present study aims to investigate publication patterns of researchers, with particular focus on gold OA and prestige. The researcher population used consists of researchers working at Swedish universities using the institutional repository DiVA. Gold OA journals are identified through the Directory of Open Access Journals and prestige is defined with the Norwegian model, where publication channels are divided in two levels. The share of gold OA journals in the Norwegian model is contrasted with the researchers' choice of publication channels. Findings suggest that researchers prefer gold OA journals belonging to the higher level in the Norwegian model. However, this may be the result of something else affecting researchers. These and other issues are discussed, as well as details of the publication patterns.

  • 10.
    Lindelöw, Camilla
    Södertörn University, Södertörn University Library.
    Utvärdering och utforskande2018In: Världen där utanför: bibliotekariens roll som omvärldsbevakare och analytiker / [ed] Marja Haapalainen ; Christine Wallén, Stockholm: Kungliga biblioteket , 2018, p. 101-120Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    Utvärdering och forskande
  • 11.
    Lindelöw, Camilla
    Södertörn University, Södertörn University Library.
    What about prestige in gold Open Access publishing: a survey investigating publication patterns of researchers at Swedish universities2015In: The 10th Munin Conference on Scholarly Publishing 2015: The 10th Munin Conference on Scholarly Publishing 2015. UiT The Arctic University of Norway, November 30 - December 1 2015., 2015, Vol. 5Conference paper (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Fully gold Open Access (OA) publication channels are still hold to be of inferior quality compared to channels offered by publishers with traditional subscription business models, albeit less and less so. The threat of predatory publishers looms on one side, and on the other most OA publishers haven’t been around to gather prestige for so long. Still, there seems to be a steady advance. For example, OA publication channels may now be found at level two (indexing the channels perceived as having most academic prestige in a certain subject) of the Norwegian Publication Model (NPM).

    In an earlier survey, I investigated the publication patterns of researchers at Swedish universities with focus on their gold OA publishing in journals. The publication patterns were contrasted with the occurrence of OA journals in NPM. 29 % of the DOAJ journals were present as approved channels in NPM. DOAJ is frequently mentioned as the most comprehensive OA journal indexing service in the world. At level one, 14 % of the listed journals were OA, whereas only 2 % of level two journals were OA. Out of the DOAJ-journals included in NPM, only 1 % made it to level two. This is probably explained by the situation described above; OA journals are often new to the scientific publishing market, and therefore they haven’t had the time to gather academic prestige.

    The OA journals that researchers at Swedish universities published were almost all of them present in DOAJ. 7 % of these were at level two. This pattern seems to imply that researchers are trying to fulfil demands of OA publishing from funders, while at the same time trying to gather prestige for their own researcher career. This poster aims to further explore these results, with focus on the 7 % journals at level 2. Which journals can be found here, and what is the distribution? Which research subjects are involved?

  • 12.
    Lindelöw, Camilla
    et al.
    Södertörn University, Södertörn University Library.
    Parmhed, Sara
    Södertörn University, Södertörn University Library.
    Forskarservice i ett förändrat publiceringslandskap2016Conference paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
    Abstract [sv]

    Framöver kommer vi att ha nationella riktlinjer för öppen tillgång till vetenskapliga publikationer att rätta oss efter. KB undersöker möjligheten att betala författaravgifter inom konsortiet. Våra användare hittar sitt material på flera ställen än biblioteket, i och med omställningen kommer de ha ökad fri tillgång till materialet. Hur påverkas vår forskarservice av detta? Vi kommer att behöva uppdatera vår existerande forskarservice för att fortsätta vara relevanta för forskarna. I denna föreslagna presentation tittar vi bland annat på kommunikationen med forskarna och samordning av statistik för att kunna möta upp de nya förutsättningarna. Vår kartläggning är tänkt att användas som underlag i diskussionen om en förbättrad forskarservice.

  • 13.
    Olsson, Lisa
    et al.
    Stockholms universitet.
    Aldberg, Henrik
    Vetenskapsrådet.
    Francke, Helena
    University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT.
    Kronman, Ulf
    Kungliga biblioteket.
    Lindelöw, Camilla
    Kungliga biblioteket.
    Willén, Niklas
    Uppsala universitet.
    Evaluation of Offset Agreements – Report 4: Springer Compact2018Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
1 - 13 of 13
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf