Change search
Refine search result
1 - 6 of 6
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Eckerberg, Katarina
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Larsson, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.
    Miljand, Matilda
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Knowledge, policy, and expertise: the UK Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 1970-2011, by Susan Owens, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 20152016In: Environmental Politics, ISSN 0964-4016, E-ISSN 1743-8934, Vol. 25, no 4, p. 761-763Article, book review (Refereed)
  • 2.
    Larsson, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.
    National environmental evaluation systems: guiding towards sustainability?2018Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Background: Dealing with environmental threats is one of the largest, if not the largest, challenge contemporary societies face. One way to better deal with this challenge would be to produce knowledge that can be used to improve environmental work and environmental policy and thus ultimately contribute to sustainable development. National environmental evaluations, which this thesis explores, could potentially fill this function because they are supposed to generate applicable and useful knowledge for improving environmental policy and practice for a sustainable transition. However, what different environmental actors view as useful knowledge varies, and needs to be empirically investigated. Against this background, the aim of this thesis is to investigate whether, and how, national environmental evaluation systems contribute to key actors’ environmental work and sustainable development. The thesis explores two national environmental evaluation systems in Sweden.

    Method: A mixed methods approach is applied that combines three methods. Firstly, a narrative synthesis is developed and applied to compile a list of sustainable development effects from national environmental evaluations. Secondly, a critical program theory is used to investigate the evaluation system’s underlying logic and to assess the likelihood of it achieving its intended effects. Thirdly, a directed content analysis is used to explore the usability and use of environmental evaluations and evaluation systems. The methods are applied to various documents, interviews with key actors, and observations at two environmental seminars.

    Results: The results show that, to contribute to sustainable development in the context of evaluation systems and network governance, environmental evaluations need to be of sufficient quality and meet different stakeholders’ knowledge needs. However, only some evaluations meet this demand. The main value of national environmental evaluations and evaluation systems is that they reinforce the national objectives, provide a recurrent report on achievement of objectives, and push actors to take responsibility to improve their environmental work.

  • 3.
    Larsson, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.
    Stakeholders' use of environmental evaluations (system) and their contribution to sustainable developmentManuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
  • 4.
    Larsson, Magnus
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.
    Translations of knowledge from an environmental evaluation system: do they contribute to usability of evaluation knowledge?Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
  • 5.
    Larsson, Magnus
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science, Umeå Centre for Evaluation Research (UCER).
    Hanberger, Anders
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science, Umeå Centre for Evaluation Research (UCER).
    Evaluation in management by objectives: a critical analysis of Sweden’s national environmental quality objectives system2016In: Evaluation, ISSN 1356-3890, E-ISSN 1461-7153, Vol. 22, no 2, p. 190-208Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article investigates what can be achieved by one particular management by objectives system – i.e. the Swedish National Environmental Quality Objectives system and its evaluation function. A critical programme theory analysis is first developed to reconstruct the programme theory of the National Environmental Quality Objectives system. Next, the robustness of the programme theory is analysed in terms of internal consistency, theoretical support and empirical support. The results indicate that, while some assumptions underlying the National Environmental Quality Objectives system are valid, the National Environmental Quality Objectives’ programme theory has low validity in several respects. The evaluative knowledge the system produces is only partly relevant to or useable by local actors and industry. While the state of the environment is observed and measured in the monitoring and evaluation reports, the direct effects of environmental policy and work are not evaluated, which is a main weakness of the National Environmental Quality Objectives system. It is unlikely that the current evaluation function can effectively support achievement of the National Environmental Quality Objectives environmental objectives. The article suggests that evaluations in support of network governance are more likely to support National Environmental Quality Objectives achievement and sustainable development.

  • 6.
    Magnus, Larsson
    et al.
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science, Umeå Centre for Evaluation Research (UCER).
    Hanberger, Anders
    Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science, Umeå Centre for Evaluation Research (UCER).
    Effects on sustainable development from large environmental programmes: a review of 16 evaluations2015In: Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, ISSN 1943-815X, E-ISSN 1943-8168, Vol. 12, no 2, p. 85-105Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The purpose of this article is to develop criteria for meta-evaluation and narrative synthesis of sustainable development (SD) effects from large environmental programmes. First the article develops the criteria and then demonstrates how these can be applied in the case of the Swedish Local Investment Programme targeting SD, through a review of 16 national evaluations. The review shows that the programme’s effects on SD are mixed: it contributed to halting degradation of ecological capital, somewhat to restoring ecological capital, and to increasing human, social, and manufactured capital. However, the programme also had some unintended negative and crowding-out effects on ecological and social capital, and on innovation. A methodological conclusion is that the evaluations lacked some essential information for assessing SD-effects. For example, more than half of the evaluations scored low on intervention effects, a key criterion in the review. Reviews of SD-effects need to compile knowledge from evaluations that use different approaches with varying quality. What is defined as acceptable quality determines if comprehensive conclusions of SD effects can be drawn.

1 - 6 of 6
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf