Change search
Refine search result
12 1 - 50 of 72
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Andersson, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Dahlberg, Mattias
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Samuelsson, Joel
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Juridikens termer2015 (ed. 10)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Juridikens termer är ett klassikt uppslagsverk som kortfattat förklarar centrala juridiska termer. Boken är sedan många år ett värdefullt hjälpmedel för verksamma jurister och studerande samt för alla andra som kommer i kontakt med frågor av juridisk natur.

  • 2.
    Bessani, Alysson
    et al.
    Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, LaSIGE, Lisbon, Portugal..
    Brandt, Joergen
    Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany..
    Bux, Marc
    Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany..
    Cogo, Vinicius
    Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, LaSIGE, Lisbon, Portugal..
    Dimitrova, Lora
    Charite, Berlin, Germany..
    Dowling, Jim
    KTH Royal Inst Technol, Stockholm, Sweden..
    Gholami, Ali
    KTH Royal Inst Technol, Stockholm, Sweden..
    Hakimzadeh, Kamal
    KTH Royal Inst Technol, Stockholm, Sweden..
    Hummel, Micheal
    Charite, Berlin, Germany..
    Ismail, Mahmoud
    KTH Royal Inst Technol, Stockholm, Sweden..
    Laure, Erwin
    KTH Royal Inst Technol, Stockholm, Sweden..
    Leser, Ulf
    Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany..
    Litton, Jan-Eric
    Karolinska Inst, Solna, Sweden..
    Martinez, Roxanna
    Karolinska Inst, Solna, Sweden..
    Niazi, Salman
    KTH Royal Inst Technol, Stockholm, Sweden..
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Zimmermann, Karin
    Charite, Berlin, Germany..
    BiobankCloud: A Platform for the Secure Storage, Sharing, and Processing of Large Biomedical Data Sets2016In: BIOMEDICAL DATA MANAGEMENT AND GRAPH ONLINE QUERYING, 2016, p. 89-105Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Biobanks store and catalog human biological material that is increasingly being digitized using next-generation sequencing (NGS). There is, however, a computational bottleneck, as existing software systems are not scalable and secure enough to store and process the incoming wave of genomic data from NGS machines. In the BiobankCloud project, we are building a Hadoop-based platform for the secure storage, sharing, and parallel processing of genomic data. We extended Hadoop to include support for multi-tenant studies, reduced storage requirements with erasure coding, and added support for extensible and consistent metadata. On top of Hadoop, we built a scalable scientific workflow engine featuring a proper workflow definition language focusing on simple integration and chaining of existing tools, adaptive scheduling on Apache Yarn, and support for iterative dataflows. Our platform also supports the secure sharing of data across different, distributed Hadoop clusters. The software is easily installed and comes with a user-friendly web interface for running, managing, and accessing data sets behind a secure 2-factor authentication. Initial tests have shown that the engine scales well to dozens of nodes. The entire system is open-source and includes pre-defined workflows for popular tasks in biomedical data analysis, such as variant identification, differential transcriptome analysis using RNA-Seq, and analysis of miRNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq data.

  • 3.
    Bull, Thomas
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Halje, Lovisa
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Bergström, Maria
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law.
    Nergelius, Joakim
    Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete, Örebro universitet.
    Arvet från Oxenstierna: Reflektioner kring den svenska förvaltningsmodellen och EU2012Report (Other academic)
  • 4. Chamberlain, Johanna
    et al.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    The Swedish Understanding of Privacy as a Fundamental Right in a Comparative Perspective — Overview and Possibilities2019In: Comparative Perspectives on Privacy in an Internet Era / [ed] Russell L. Weaver, Jane Reichel, Steven I. Friedland, Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press, 2019, p. 85-112Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 5. Eklund, Agnes
    et al.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Enskilda och EU-rättens genomförande2015In: De lege 2015: Europarätten – 20 år i Sverige / [ed] Mattias Dahlberg & Karin Åhman, Iustus förlag, 2015Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 6.
    Gholami, Ali
    et al.
    KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
    Lind, Anna-Sara
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Litton, Jan-Eric
    Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska institutet.
    Edlund, Åke
    High Performance Computing and Visualization Department, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
    Laure, Erwin
    High Performance Computing and Visualization Department, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
    Design and Implementation of the advanced cloud privacy threat modeling2016In: International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications, ISSN 0975-2307, E-ISSN 0974-9330, Vol. 8, no 2, p. 103-122Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Privacy-preservation for sensitive data has become a challenging issue in cloud computing. Threat modeling as a part of requirements engineering in secure software development provides a structured approach for identifying attacks and proposing countermeasures against the exploitation of vulnerabilities in a system. This paper describes an extension of Cloud Privacy Threat Modeling (CPTM) methodology for privacy threat modeling in relation to processing sensitive data in cloud computing environments. It describes the modeling methodology that involved applying Method Engineering to specify characteristics of a cloud privacy threat modeling methodology, different steps in the proposed methodology and corresponding products. In addition, a case study has been implemented as a proof of concept to demonstrate the usability of the proposed methodology. We believe that the extended methodology facilitates the application of a privacy-preserving cloud software development approach from requirements engineering to design.

  • 7.
    Gholami, Ali
    et al.
    KTH.
    Lind, Anna-Sara
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Litton, Jan-Eric
    KI.
    Edlund, Åke
    KTH.
    Laurie, Erwin
    KTH.
    Privacy Threat Modeling for Emerging BiobankClouds2014In: Procedia Computer Science, ISSN 1877-0509, E-ISSN 1877-0509, Vol. 37, p. 489-496Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    There is an increased amount of data produced by next generation sequencing (NGS) machines which demand scalable storageand analysis of genomic data. In order to cope with this huge amount of information, many biobanks are interested in cloudcomputing capabilities such as on-demand elasticity of computing power and storage capacity. There are several security andprivacy requirements mandated by personal data protection legislation which hinder biobanks from migrating big data generatedby the NGS machines. This paper describes the privacy requirements of platform-as-service BiobankClouds according to theEuropean Data Protection Directive (DPD). It identifies several key privacy threats which leave BiobankClouds vulnerable to anattack. This study benefits health-care application designers in the requirement elicitation cycle when building privacy-preservingBiobankCloud platforms.

  • 8.
    Hettne, Jörgen
    et al.
    juridiska institutionen, Lunds universitet.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Att göra rätt och i tid: Behövs nya metoder för att genomföra direktiv i Sverige?2012Report (Refereed)
  • 9.
    Klingstrom, Tomas
    et al.
    Swedish Univ Agr Sci, SLU Global Bioinformat Ctr, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, Ulls Vag 26, Uppsala, Sweden..
    Mendy, Maimuna
    Int Agcy Res Canc, Lyon, France..
    Meunier, Dominique
    Int Agcy Res Canc, Lyon, France..
    Berger, Anouk
    Int Agcy Res Canc, Lyon, France..
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Christoffels, Alan
    Univ Western Cape, South African Natl Bioinformat Inst, Bellville, South Africa..
    Bendou, Hocine
    Univ Western Cape, South African Natl Bioinformat Inst, Bellville, South Africa..
    Swanepoel, Carmen
    Smit, Lemoene
    BikaLabs, Western Cape, South Africa..
    Mckellar-Basset, Campbell
    BikaLabs, Western Cape, South Africa..
    Bongcam-Rudloff, Erik
    Soderberg, Jonas
    Merino-Martinez, Roxana
    Karolinska Inst, Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm, Sweden..
    Amatya, Suyesh
    Karolinska Inst, Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm, Sweden..
    Kihara, Absolomon
    Int Livestock Res Inst, Nairobi, Kenya..
    Kemp, Steve
    Int Livestock Res Inst, Nairobi, Kenya..
    Reihs, Robert
    Inst Pathol, Med Res Ctr, Graz, Austria..
    Mueller, Heimo
    Inst Pathol, Med Res Ctr, Graz, Austria..
    Supporting the Development of Biobanks in Low and Medium Income Countries2016In: 2016 IST-AFRICA WEEK CONFERENCE / [ed] Paul Cunningham and Miriam Cunningham, 2016, article id 236Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Biobanks are an organized collection of biological material and associated data. They are a fundamental resource for life science research and contribute to the development of pharmaceutical drugs, diagnostic markers and to a deeper understanding of the genetics that regulate the development of all life on earth. Biobanks are well established in High Income Countries (HIC) and are rapidly emerging in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). Surveys among biobanks operating in a LMIC setting indicate that limited resources and short term funding tied to specific projects threaten the sustainability of the biobanks. Fit-for-purpose biobanks targeting major societal challenges such as HIV and Malaria provide an excellent basis for integrating biobanks with the available research communities in LMIC regions. But to become sustainable for the future it is important that biobanks become an integrated part of local research communities. To achieve this, the cost of operating biobanks must be lowered, templates must be developed to support local ethics committees and researchers must be given the opportunity to build experience in successfully operating biobank based research projects. The B3Africa consortium is based on these conclusions and set up to support biobank based research by creating a cost efficient Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) for developing biobanks and also contribute to the training and capacity building in the local research community. The technical platform called the eB3Kit is open source and consists of a LIMS and a bioinformatics module based on the eBiokit that allow researchers to take control over the analysis of their own data. Along with the technical platform the consortium will also contribute training and support for the associated infrastructures necessary to regulate the ethical and legal implications of biobank based research.

  • 10.
    Klingström, Tomas
    et al.
    SLU-Global Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden..
    Bongcam Rudloff, Erik
    SLU-Global Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden..
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Legal & ethical compliance when sharing biospecimen2018In: Briefings in Functional Genomics & Proteomics, ISSN 2041-2649, E-ISSN 2041-2657, Vol. 17, no 1, p. 1-7Article, review/survey (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    When obtaining samples from biobanks, resolving ethical and legal concerns is a time-consuming task where researchers need to balance the needs of privacy, trust and scientific progress. The Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure-large Prospective Cohorts project has resolved numerous such issues through intense ommunication between involved researchers and experts in its mission to unite large  rospective study sets in Europe. To facilitate efficient communication, it is useful for onexperts to have an at least basic understanding of the regulatory systemformanaging biological samples. Laws regulating research oversight are based on national law and normally share core principles founded on international charters. In interview studies among donors, chief concerns are privacy, efficient sample utilization and access to information generated fromtheir samples. Despite a lack of clear evidence regarding which concern takes precedence, scientific as well as public discourse has largely focused on privacy concerns and the right of donors to control the usage of their samples. It is therefore important to  roactively deal with ethical and legal issues to avoid complications that delay or prevent samples from being accessed. To help biobank professionals avoid making unnecessary mistakes, we have developed this basic primer covering the relationship between ethics and law, the concept of informed consent and considerations for returning findings to donors.

  • 11.
    Klingström, Tomas
    et al.
    SLU-Global Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
    Mendy, Maimuna
    Dominique Meunier International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
    Meunier, Dominique
    International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
    Berger, Anouk
    International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Christoffels, Alan
    South African National Bioinformatics Institute University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
    Bendou, Hocine
    South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
    Swanepoel, Carmen
    South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
    Smit, Lemoene
    BikaLabs, Western Cape, South Africa.
    Mckellar-Basset, Campbell
    BikaLabs, Western Cape, South Africa .
    Bongcam-Rudloff, Erik
    SLU-Global Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
    Sýderberg, Jonas
    SLU-Global Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
    Merino-Martinez, Roxana
    Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Amatya, Suyesh
    Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Kihara, Absolomon
    International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
    Kemp, Steve
    International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
    Reihs, Robert
    Institute for Pathology / Center for Medical Research, Graz, Austria.
    Mýller, Heimo
    Institute for Pathology / Center for Medical Research, Graz, Austria .
    Supporting the development of biobanks in low and medium income countries2016Conference paper (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Biobanks are an organized collection of biological material and associated data. They are a fundamental resource for life science research and contribute to the development of pharmaceutical drugs, diagnostic markers and to a deeper understanding of the genetics that regulate the development of all life on earth. Biobanks are well established in High Income Countries (HIC) and are rapidly emerging in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). Surveys among biobanks operating in a LMIC setting indicate that limited resources and short term funding tied to specific projects threaten the sustainability of the biobanks. Fit-for-purpose biobanks targeting major societal challenges such as HIV and Malaria provide an excellent basis for integrating biobanks with the available research communities in LMIC regions. But to become sustainable for the future it is important that biobanks become an integrated part of local research communities. To achieve this, the cost of operating biobanks must be lowered, templates must be developed to support local ethics committees and researchers must be given the opportunity to build experience in successfully operating biobank based research projects. The B3Africa consortium is based on these conclusions and set up to support biobank based research by creating a cost efficient Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) for developing biobanks and also contribute to the training and capacity building in the local research community. The technical platform called the eB3Kit is open source and consists of a LIMS and a bioinformatics module based on the eBiokit that allow researchers to take control over the analysis of their own data. Along with the technical platform the consortium will also contribute training and support for the associated infrastructures necessary to regulate the ethical and legal implications of biobank based research.

  • 12.
    Lind, Anna-Sara
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Administrating Data Protection: or the Fort Knox of the European Composite Administration?2014In: Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft (KritV), ISSN 0179-2830, Vol. 1, p. 44-57Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 13.
    Lind, Anna-Sara
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Reichel, JaneUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Administrative Law beyond the State: Nordic perspectives2013Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 14.
    Lind, Anna-Sara
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Introduction2013In: Administrative Law Beyond the State  - Nordic Perspectives / [ed] Anna-Sara Lind & Jane Reichel, Stockholm: Liber, 2013, p. 12-21Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 15.
    Lind, Anna-Sara
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Regulating cross border biobanking through an "ERIC"?2013Other (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 16.
    Lind, Anna-Sara
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Reichel, JaneUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.Österdahl, IngerUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Information and law in transition: freedom of speech, the internet, privacy and democracy in the 21st century2015Conference proceedings (editor) (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this book we have gathered a number of prominent scholars who analyze the developments of information and law from their respective perspective. The papers were first presented at a colloquium at the Faculty of Law, Uppsala University in September 2014.

    The book is divided into two parts. The first part of the book is comprised of the contributions having a more general scope; developments within a new landscape, regulatory matters and questions relating to security, technology and information. The second part sets information and law in contexts and focuses towards more specific matters; fundamental rights in a new context, issues relating to the right to be forgotten and finally, welfare, health and research.

    The Internet and other information and communication technologies have created exciting new possibilities for connecting individuals across borders and continents. The new technologies also raise significant legal, ethical and political concerns. The Internet has thus permitted the instantaneous dissemination of information as well as created an entirely new arena for hate speech. New information and communication technologies have made possible the creation of large registries and databases with the potential to lead to effective cross-border law enforcement, foster important new research as well as unwarranted mapping of individual persons’ private life. How society responds to this can have an impact on how we perceive democracy, and the realization of the rule of law, as well as on transparency and legitimacy in communication between individuals and states. It also affects the relationship between the public sphere and the individual.

  • 17.
    Lind, Anna-Sara
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Österdahl, Inger
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Introduction - Information and Law in transition: Freedom of speech, the Internet, Privacy and Democracy2015In: Information and Law in transition: Freedom of speech, the Internet, Privacy and Democracy in the 21st Century / [ed] Lind, A-S, Reichel, J, Österdahl, I, Liber förlag , 2015, p. 12-19Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 18.
    Persson, Mats
    et al.
    Göteborgs universitet.
    Giertz, Magdalena
    fristående.
    Hellstadius, Åsa
    Stockholms universitet.
    Nilsson, Mattias
    Fristående.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Sjödin, Erik
    Stockholms universitet.
    Ågren, Jack
    Stockholms universitet.
    Åhman, Karin
    Stockholms universitet.
    Svensk juridik2017Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Svensk juridik är en grundläggande lärobok i juridik där författarna på ett modernt, pedagogiskt och överskådligt sätt beskriver stora delar av det svenska rättssystemet. Boken går förhållandevis djupt för att vara en grundläggande lärobok, samtidigt som författarna lagt ner mycket arbete på att anpassa texten till modernt språkbruk. En mängd exempel och förklarande skisser gör det komplicerade mer lättillgängligt. Författarnas ambition är inte endast att läsaren ska få förståelse för juridiken utan även vinna insikt om hur juridiken används och fungerar i praktiken.

  • 19.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law.
    Anmälan av Niels Fenger, Forvaltning & Faellesskab. Om EU-rettens betydning for den almindelige forvaltningsret: Konfrontation og frugtbar sameksistens, Jurist- og Økonomförbundets forlag, Köpenhamn, 20042006In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, p. 713-715Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 20.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Ansvarsutkrävande: Svensk förvaltning i EU2010Book (Other academic)
  • 21.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    BBMRI-ERIC – an analysis of a multi-level governance tool for the EU and beyond2013In: Administrative Law beyond the State - Nordic Perspectives / [ed] Anna-Sara Lind & Jane Reichel, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013, p. 85-118Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 22.
    Reichel, Jane
    juridiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.
    Between Supremacy and Autonomy: – Applying the Principle of Good Administration in the Member States2008In: General Principles of European Community. Law in a Process of Development, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International , 2008Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 23.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Communicating with the European Composite Administration2014In: German Law Journal, ISSN 2071-8322, E-ISSN 2071-8322, no 15, p. 883-906Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 24.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law.
    Den svenska förvaltningsmodellen i det europeiska samarbetsprojektet2016In: Statskontoret och Sieps, Statsförvaltningen efter 20 år i EU, om offentlig sektor, 2016 / [ed] Ingvar Mattson, Stockholm: Statskontoret , 2016, p. 57-81Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 25.
    Reichel, Jane
    Juridiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.
    Direkt effekt - EG-domstolen visar upp en återhållsam sida. Kommentar till mål C- 157/02 Rieser2004In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, p. 473-487Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 26.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Domstol och/eller förvaltning2011In: Svensk Juristtidning, ISSN 0039-6591, no 4, p. 440-450Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 27.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    EU governance for research and ethics in biobanks2015In: Ethics, Law and Governance of Biobanking: National, European and International Profiles / [ed] Deborah Mascalzoni, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer , 2015Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 28.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    European Legal Method from a Swedish Perspective: Rights, Compensation and the Role of the Courts2011In: European Legal Method: Paradoxes and revitalisation / [ed] Ruth Nielsen, Ulla Nergaard and Lynn Roseberry, Copenhagen: DJØF , 2011Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 29.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Europeiska principer för god förvaltning2017In: Offentligrättsliga principer / [ed] Lena Marcusson, Iustus förlag, 2017, 3Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 30.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Europeiska principer för god förvaltning och 2017 års förvaltningslag2018In: Förvaltningsrättslig Tidskrift, ISSN 0015-8585, no 3, p. 423-441Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [sv]

    I artikeln behandlas införandet av en ny rubrik om ”grunderna för god förvaltning” i 2017 års FL, under vilken centrala rättsstatliga principer samt regler för service, tillgänglighet och samverkan har samlats. Principen om god förvaltning är sedan lång tid etablerad inom EU-rätten och förekommer även i dokument från Europarådet samt i viss utsträckning inom Europadomstolens praxis. I artikeln analyseras frågan hur den svenska versionen med ”grunderna för god förvaltning” förhåller sig till de europeiska principerna, vad gäller såväl innehåll som funktion av standard eller utkrävbar rättighet. I vad mån kan EU-domstolens senare praxis avseende tillämpningen av principen om god förvaltning på nationell nivå inverka på hur FL tolkas och tillämpas? Analysen görs mot bakgrund av de syften som reformen av FL har avsett att uppfylla, att stärka enskildas rättssäkerhet, införa ett mer heltäckande förfarande och att göra lagen mer lättillgänglig.

  • 31.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    EU-rättslig metod 2013In: Juridisk metodlära / [ed] Fredric Korling, Mauro Zamboni, Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2013, p. 109-140Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 32.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    EU-rättsliga källor i svensk förvaltningsrätt – något om governance-verktyg och metod2013In: Allmänt och enskilt - offentlig rätt i omvandling: Festskrift till Lena Marcusson / [ed] Thomas Bull, Olle Lundin, Elisabeth Rynning, Uppsala: Iustus förlag, 2013, p. 271-292Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 33.
    Reichel, Jane
    juridiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.
    EU:s påverkan på svensk förvaltningsprocess2007In: Europarättslig tidskrift, p. 758-776Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 34.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Gillberg v. Sweden: forskningsmaterial till allmänhetens tjänst2013In: Juridisk Tidskrift, ISSN 1100-7761, no 4, p. 922-928Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 35.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Globaliseringen av förvaltningsrätten - särskilt om biobanker2012In: Festskrift till Pär Hallström / [ed] Matthias Derlén och Johan Lindholm, uppsala: Iustus förlag, 2012, p. 319-339Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 36.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Herwig C.H. Hofmann, Gerard C. Rowe och Alexander H. Türk, AdministrativeLaw and Policy of the European Union, Oxford University Press, 2011,938 s. och Matthias Ruffert och Sebastian Steinecke, The Global AdministrativeLaw of Science, Springer, Berlin och Heidelberg, 2011, 118 s.2013In: Juridisk Tidskrift, ISSN 1100-7761, no 3, p. 710-715Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 37.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Judicial Control in a Globalized Legal Order – A One Way Track?: An analysis of the case C-263/08 Djurgården-Lilla Värtan2010In: Review of European Administrative Law, ISSN 1874-7981, Vol. 3, no 2, p. 69-87Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article examines the preliminary ruling given by the Court of Justice in the Djurgården-Lilla Värtan case. The case involves the Swedish implementation of the Aarhus Convention via an EU Directive, granting right to access to justice to environmental non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Even though the Aarhus Convention and the Directive both state that the right to access to justice is granted only to NGOs "meeting any requirements under national law", the Court of Justice found that Swedish requirements were too restrictive. The question arises whether there is still room for the Member States to choose other enforcement models rather than judicial control when monitoring the implementation of EU law. If not, how does this affect the constitutional systems of the Member States as a whole? More precisely, what about the national parliaments?

  • 38.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Lojalitet, legalitet och legitimitet: Nya utmaningar i EU:s integrerade förvaltning2009In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, no 4, p. 607-614Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 39.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Nationella dataskyddmyndigheter som lagprövare av EU-rätten: en analys av EU-domstolens dom i mål C‑362/14, Schrems (Safe harbor-målet)2016In: Förvaltningsrättslig Tidskrift, ISSN 0015-8585, -, no 1, p. 161-170Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 40.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Offentlighet eller dataskydd som ledande princip i EU:s integrerade förvaltning?2018In: Förvaltningsrättslig Tidskrift, ISSN 0015-8585, no 1, p. 91-113Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [sv]

    Informationshantering har kommit att bli en central del i samarbetet mellan EU:s institutioner, myndigheter och organ och nationella myndigheter, vanligen benämnt den europeiska integrerade förvaltningen. En stor del av de kontakter som tas mellan de samarbetande myndigheterna rör insamling, delning och spridning av information, både i myndigheternas faktiska förvaltning och som underlag i enskilda ärenden. Reglering av informationshantering har utvecklats till ett viktigt policyområde för EU-lagstiftaren, med bl.a. en strategi för en inre digital marknad och en ny allmän dataskyddsförordning som träder i kraft i maj 2018. Därutöver har EU-domstolen utvecklat en progressiv praxis till skydd för den grundläggande rätten till skydd för personuppgifter. En viktig fråga ur svenskt perspektiv är hur utvecklingen påverkar den svenska offentlighetsprincipen, såsom den kommer till uttryck i tryckfrihetsförordningen. I artikeln analyseras rättsfall från EU-domstolen och Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen som väger intresset av offentlighet mot intresset av dataskydd, liksom förslaget om reglering av informationshantering i ReNEUALs  modellag för den europeiska förvaltningen. Kan Sverige fortsätta att ha offentlighetsprincipen som den ledande principen för sin förvaltning, när förvaltningen i en allt större utsträckning samverkar och delar information med europeiska och nationella organ inom EU:s integrerade förvaltning?

  • 41.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Offentlighet i en globaliserad värld2019In: Festskrift till Wiweka Warnling Conradson / [ed] Richard Arvidsson, Pernilla Leviner, Jane Reichel, Mauro Zamboni, Karin Åhman, Stockholm: jure , 2019, p. 335-376Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 42.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Oversight of EU medical data transfers: An administrative law perspective on cross-border biomedical research administration2017In: Health and Technology, ISSN 2190-7188, E-ISSN 2190-7196, Vol. 7, no 4, p. 389-400Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The notionof privacy has longhad a central rolein human rights law, not least in connection to health and medicine.International, regional and national bodies have enacted a number of binding and non-binding document for physicians and researchers to adhere to, in order to protect the autonomy, dignity and privacy of patients and research subjects. With the development of new technologies, the right to privacy has gained a new perspective; the right to protection of personal data with in information and communication technologies. The right to data protection has been attributed an increasing  importance within EU law. Accordingly, the use of health data in medical research in general and in biobankrelated medical research in particular, has made data protection law highly relevant. In medical research involving biobanks, transferring human biological samples and/or individual health data is taking place on a daily basis.These transfers involve several oversight bodies, institutional review boards (IRBs), research ethics committees, or even data protection authorities. This article investigates the role of these national oversight bodies in the transfer of health data in cross border research, from an EU law point of view. A special focus is laid on transfer of health data for research purposes from the EU to the US, in the light of the recently enacted EU US Privacy Shield.The main question posed is how American oversight bodies for medical research can be expected to handle the increasingly strict EU requirements for the processing of health data in medical research review.

  • 43.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Privacy Shield to once again ensure safe harbours for data transfers2016Other (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 44.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Public Access or Data Protection as a Guiding Principle in the EU's Composite Administration?: An Analysis of the ReNEUAL Model Code in the Light of Swedish and Europan Case Law2018In: Scandinavian Studies in Law, ISSN 0085-5944, Vol. 65, p. 285-308Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 45.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law.
    Rättsliga begränsningar av myndigheters fria skön – från ett EU-rättsligt och svenskt perspektiv2015In: upphandlingsrättslig tidskrift, Vol. 4, p. 338-361Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 46.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Rättstatsprincipen och sanktioner mot enskilda - kan medlemsstaterna låta EU bestämma?2019In: EU och nationalstatens återkomst / [ed] Antonina Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Anna Michalski, Lars Oxelheim, Falun: Santérus förlag , 2019, p. 217-245Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 47.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University.
    Svensk livsmedelspolitik i EU: styrning och kontroll, Siepsrapport 2008:102008Report (Other academic)
  • 48.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law.
    Svensk offentlighet i en integrerad förvaltning2015In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, no 1, p. 54-60Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 49.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law.
    The Need for a Legitimate Regulatory Regime in Bioethics: A Global and European Perspective2013In: Soft Law / [ed] Jessica van der Sluijs, Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law , 2013, 58, p. 197-216Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 50.
    Reichel, Jane
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    The Need for a Legitimate Regulatory Regime in Bioethics: A Global and European Perspective2013In: Missouri law review, Vol. 78, no 1, p. 465-488Article, review/survey (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Bioethics in global biobanking touches upon several internationally acceptedfundamental rights and values, namely the sample donor's right ofprivacy, the patient's right to health, and - at least implicitly - scientific freedom.From the perspective of fundamental rights, however, there are veryfew internationally applicable rules as to the enforcement of these rights atthe administrative level. Instead, the combination of the practical need forcommon rules and the lack of political will and/or legislative competencewithin the international community or the European Union (EU) seems tohave paved the way for soft law. Further, the role of courts in the area ofbioethics and biobanking, nationally as well as internationally, is limited.The implementation of administrative rules at the national or regional levelsis carried out by research committees and research funding institutions, usuallywith limited or no right to appeal to the general court system. Consequently,the traditional mechanisms of political and judicial control to a largeextent are unavailable. The question raised here is whether the theories connectedto global administrative law can be of any guidance in developing alegitimate regulatory regime for international biobanking. Can principles ofparticipation, transparency, and reasoned decisions be of relevance in this area of law?

12 1 - 50 of 72
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf