Conventionalized impoliteness in English and Polish: The case of ‘you idiot!
Daniel Van Olmen & Marta Andersson
(Lancaster University, Uppsala University)
Keywords: address, conventionalization, evaluative meaning, impoliteness, questionnaire
Earlier research has argued that the YOU+NP! patterns in (1) and (2) are constructions (in a Construction Grammar sense; Goldberg 2006): they constitute distinct forms dedicated to the function of addressee evaluation (see also Davies 1986 among others). This assessment may be positive (e.g. you angel!) but the construction has been shown, with corpus data, to exhibit a strong bias toward insults in usage in English and a very strong one in Polish.
(1) “Thanks a lot, you stupid bitch!” screamed Vultureman. Chilla was enraged by the unprovoked profanity. (enTenTen18)
(2) Już mam ochotę wrzeszczeć: ty mendo, … ja ci pokażę, ja cię kwasem obleję!
‘I feel like screaming: you douche, … I'll show you, I'll pour acid on you!’ (plTenTen19)
Following Terkourafi (2005) on politeness formulae and against the dominant view in the field that (im)politeness is primarily socio-pragmatic in nature rather than inherent in linguistic form (e.g. Van der Bom and Mills 2015), these results have been taken to suggest that YOU+NP! is conventionalized considerably for negative addressee evaluation, even more so in Polish than in English. This association with impoliteness has, moreover, been attributed to the pragmatic explicitness and thus directness (Culpeper and Haugh 2014) of referring to the target with ‘you’.
This paper seeks to put the claims about English versus Polish and about the impact of ‘you’ to the test, by conducting an online questionnaire asking native speakers to assess, on seven-point Likert scales, the well-formedness (1=very unnatural, 7=very natural) and evaluative meaning (1=very negative, 4=neither positive nor negative, 7=very positive) of stimuli in short, general scenarios. The stimuli, which are as similar as possible for both languages, differ in the presence/absence of ‘you’ and in the nouns, ranging from negatively and positively evaluative ones (e.g. NE ‘idiot’, PE ‘angel’) over neutral ones denoting humans and things (e.g. NH ‘waiter’, NT ‘pan’) to pseudo-nouns (e.g. P ‘wabe’; cf. Jain 2022). The hypotheses that we intend to test are:
(i) without ‘you’, NEs, PEs and NHs are judged the more well-formed addresses but, with ‘you’, just the evaluative nouns stand out and especially NEs while NHs score lower and NTs and Ps higher for well-formedness with than without ‘you’;
(ii) NEs’ evaluative meaning is deemed (even) more negative with than without ‘you’ and NHs, NTs and Ps too are seen as (more) negative with ‘you’ (than without it);
(iii) these two tendencies are stronger in Polish than in English.
The collection of the data, which will undergo statistical analysis (ANOVAs, Bonferroni-corrected post hoc t-tests), is ongoing. Our preliminary results, however, appear to be in line with the hypotheses. Evidence for (i) shows that YOU+NP! is an evaluative construction, even able to turn unlikely NPs into (evaluative) addresses. Support for (ii) confirms that ‘you’ increases the effect of already negatively evaluative NPs and that YOU+NP! is conventionalized considerably for impoliteness, coercing non-evaluative NPs into a negative (rather than positive) interpretation. Evidence for (iii) indicates that this conventionalization is more established in Polish than in English.
References
Culpeper, Jonathan and Michael Haugh (2014), Pragmatics and the English Language, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Davies, Eirlys E. (1986), English vocatives: A look at their function and form, Studia Anglica Posnaniniensis 19(1), 92-106.
Goldberg, Adele (2006), Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jain, Kate H. (2022), You Hoboken! Semantics of an expressive label marker, Linguistics and Philosophy 45(2), 365-391.
Terkourafi, Marina (2005), Pragmatic correlates of frequency of use: The case for a notion of “minimal context”, in S. Marmaridou, K. Nikiforidou and E. Antonopoulou (eds), (2005), Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century, Berlin: De Gruyter, 209-233.
Van der Bom, Isabelle and Sara Mills (2015), A discursive approach to the analysis of politeness data, Journal of Politeness Research 11(2), 179-206.