Abstract
A new generation of EN 1992-1-1 (2004) also known as Eurocode 2 is under development
and currently there is a set of proposed provisions regarding section 6.4
about punching shear, PT1prEN 1992-1-1(2017). It was of interest to compare the
proposal with the current punching shear design provisions.
The aim of this master thesis was to compare the punching shear resistance obtained
in accordance with both design codes. Furthermore the eect of some parameters
on the resistance was to be compared. It was also of interest to evaluate the userfriendliness
of the proposal.
In order to meet the aim, a case study of a real at slab with drop panels was performed
together with a parametric study of a pure ctive at slab. The parametric
study was performed for inner, edge and corner columns in the cases prestressed,
without and with shear reinforcement.
It was concluded that the distance
av from the column axis to the contra exural
location has a big in uence on the punching shear resistance. The factor
ddg
considering concrete type and aggregate properties also has a big impact on the resistance.
The simplied estimation of
av according to 6.4.3(2) in PT1prEN 1992-1-1
(2017) may be inaccurate in some cases.
The length
b0 of the control perimeter has a larger eect on the resistance in EN
1992-1-1 (2004) than in PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017).
In PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017), studs located outside the second row has no impact
on the resistance.
The tensioning force in a prestressed at slab has a larger in uence on the resistance
in PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017) than in EN 1992-1-1 (2004). Furthermore,
the reinforcement ratio is increased by the tendons, and thus aect the resistance in
PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017).
Clearer provisions for the denition of the support strip
bs for corners and ends
of walls are needed in PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017).
It may be questionable if the reduction of the perimeter for a large supported area in
accordance with 6.4.2(4) in PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017) underestimates the resistance
v
in some cases.
Considering the work-load with PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017), more parameters are
included. However, they may not require that much eort to obtain.
Keywords: Punching shear, resistance, concrete, at slab, design provisions, Eurocode
2, case study, parametric study, shear reinforcement, prestressed
vi