Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The environmental economics of a global ban on mercury-added products
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2264-7043
2011 (English)Report (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The main objective of this paper is to explore the efficiency of two regulatory options in the context of a global commitment to gradually phase-out the use of mercury-added products. In the first case no mercury-added products would be allowed unless they are listed in an annex (the negative list), while in the second case all mercury-added products would be allowed unless they are listed in an annex (the positive list). In both cases countries may have time to make the transition away from these products through the use of exemptions. The paper provides first a conceptual discussion of bans as regulatory instruments and of the use of technology-forcing standards to attain deep reductions in the use of hazardous substances, and we outline a simple theoretical framework within which the above regulatory options for mercury-added products can be analyzed. This framework is employed to analyze some important pros and cons of the negative and the positive list approaches. Specifically, we address a number of factors that may differ across the two options, such as: (a) the potential presence of different types of information inefficiencies; (b) the flexibility in compliance measures granted by the two approaches; (c) the significance of administration costs as well as other relevant policy implementation issues. The analysis indicates that the negative list approach could facilitate a more cost-effective phase-out of mercury, in part since in this case an individual country seeking exemption would bear the burden of identifying the need for the exemption. With the positive list approach it would be more difficult to induce mercury users to reveal their true costs of substituting to other substances.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sundbyberg: Swedish Chemcials Agency , 2011. , p. 24
Series
PM ; 3/11
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-23524Local ID: 74ecf7d1-4662-42a5-aa56-15c34efdcfb2OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-23524DiVA: diva2:996573
Note
Godkänd; 2011; 20111123 (patriks)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2017-11-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(361 kB)5 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 361 kBChecksum SHA-512
0894ea59c1496fce522c4aff4518792fea49bec7c8e381045053b418b3398cd7e82b14ca049f0214713bea0d26498f1982d04035c293dc12be53a2a36834a041
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

http://www.kemi.se/sv/Innehall/Publikationer/PM/

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Söderholm, Patrik
By organisation
Social Sciences
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 5 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 19 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf