Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
License to Mine: A Comparison of the Scope of the Environmental Assessment in Sweden, Finland and Russia
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
Faculty of Law, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi.
Institute of Industrial Ecology Problems in the North, Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Science, Apatity.
Institute of Industrial Ecology Problems in the North, Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Science, Apatity.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Natural Resources, ISSN 2158-706X, E-ISSN 2158-7086, Vol. 6, 237-255 p., 6Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The regulatory framework for mining operations is complex; the licensing process in particular typically involves several laws and a number of permits. This paper assumes that the regulatory framework is strongly influenced by the institutional framework of which it is part, and that it suffers from an institutional path dependence that may decrease the efficiency of the system as well as act barrier to the implementation of necessary environmental requirements. The paper provides: 1) a legal analysis of the regulatory framework governing mining operations in Sweden, Finland and Russia; and 2) a comparative analysis of the scope of the environmental assessment within the licensing process in the examined countries. The result of the analysis of the regulatory frameworks shows great similarity between the Swedish and the Finnish systems, both in terms of the overall structure and the implementation of substantive environmental rules. The Russian system differs in this respect, with more declarative rules and seemingly less substantive assessments. The results also indicate that the regulatory frameworks in all three countries show signs of institutional path dependence, but in very different degrees. Though Russia has indeed implemented major changes in the formal structure, very little has changed in practice. The Swedish regulatory framework for mining shows a deficient systematics and conflicting objectives, despite the implementation of a comprehensive environmental legislation. The recently reformed Finnish system seems to have a more holistic approach.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 6, 237-255 p., 6
Keyword [en]
Keyword [sv]
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-14285DOI: 10.4236/nr.2015.64022Local ID: da2f62ba-607f-4f38-9f28-cc06bb88d550OAI: diva2:987239
Validerad; 2015; Nivå 1; 20150417 (mariap)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(377 kB)0 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 377 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pettersson, Maria
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
Natural Resources

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link