Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
High load lifting exercise and low load motor control exercises as interventions for patients with mechanical low back pain: A randomized controlled trial with 24-month follow-up
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Health and Rehab.
Cederkliniken Primary Health Care Centre.
Department of Orthopaedics, Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University.
Umeå University, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Physiotherapy.
2016 (English)In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 48, no 5, 456–463- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a high load lifting exercise with low load motor control exercises on pain intensity, disability and health-related quality of life for patients with mechanical low back pain.DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.SUBJECTS: Patients with mechanical low back pain as their dominating pain mechanism. METHODS: The intervention programme consisted of a high load lifting exercise, while the control group received low load motor control exercises over 8 weeks (12 sessions) with pain education included in both intervention arms. The primary outcome was pain intensity and disability, and the secondary outcome was health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Each intervention arm included 35 participants, analysed following 2-, 12- and 24-month follow-up. There was no significant difference between the high load lifting and low load motor control interventions for the primary or secondary outcome measures. Between 50% and 80% of participants reported a decrease in perceived pain intensity and disability for both short- and long-term follow-up.CONCLUSION: No difference was observed between the high low load lifting and low load motor control interventions. Both interventions included retraining of movement patterns and pain education, which might explain the positive results over time

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 48, no 5, 456–463- p.
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-13271DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2091Local ID: c77c6615-68f7-4ba6-b634-f0b84c3f3c8fOAI: diva2:986223
Validerad; 2016; Nivå 2; 20160421 (andbra)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(384 kB)4 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 384 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Michaelson, Peter
By organisation
Health and Rehab
In the same journal
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 4 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link