Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
High load lifting exercise and low load motor control exercises as interventions for patients with mechanical low back pain: A randomized controlled trial with 24-month follow-up
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Health and Rehab.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0112-4657
Cederkliniken Primary Health Care Centre.
Department of Orthopaedics, Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University.
Umeå University, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Physiotherapy.
2016 (English)In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 48, no 5, p. 456-463Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a high load lifting exercise with low load motor control exercises on pain intensity, disability and health-related quality of life for patients with mechanical low back pain.DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.SUBJECTS: Patients with mechanical low back pain as their dominating pain mechanism. METHODS: The intervention programme consisted of a high load lifting exercise, while the control group received low load motor control exercises over 8 weeks (12 sessions) with pain education included in both intervention arms. The primary outcome was pain intensity and disability, and the secondary outcome was health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Each intervention arm included 35 participants, analysed following 2-, 12- and 24-month follow-up. There was no significant difference between the high load lifting and low load motor control interventions for the primary or secondary outcome measures. Between 50% and 80% of participants reported a decrease in perceived pain intensity and disability for both short- and long-term follow-up.CONCLUSION: No difference was observed between the high low load lifting and low load motor control interventions. Both interventions included retraining of movement patterns and pain education, which might explain the positive results over time

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 48, no 5, p. 456-463
National Category
Physiotherapy
Research subject
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-13271DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2091PubMedID: 27097785Local ID: c77c6615-68f7-4ba6-b634-f0b84c3f3c8fOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-13271DiVA, id: diva2:986223
Note

Validerad; 2016; Nivå 2; 20160421 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2017-11-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(384 kB)195 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 384 kBChecksum SHA-512
872e7d3d42ec156f8d2487f6ae4f6071812ee1c08be1e56232eef4cc63e5ff6e706dfd4dbfa3f42795636fac22e0e267bf82f0ae07e2f9859407634c9aa3114e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Michaelson, Peter
By organisation
Health and Rehab
In the same journal
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 195 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 37 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf