Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Predicting the strength of sawn wood products: a comparison between x-ray scanning of logs and machine strength grading of lumber
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.
2005 (English)In: Forest products journal, ISSN 0015-7473, Vol. 55, no 9, 55-60 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

For a long time, process improvements in sawmills have focused on high productivity measured in volume per hour and volume recovery. As sawmills become increasingly efficient, the importance of focusing on value recovery becomes obvious. In order to maximize value recovery, sawmills need the ability to sort logs according to properties such as strength. The aim of this study was to compare the results of predicting the strength of center boards based on x-ray scanning of logs with the results obtained by machine strength grading using a bending machine. The study was based on 131 Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) sawlogs that were scanned with an x-ray LogScanner and then sawn into boards. The bending stiffness of the center boards was tested using a strength-grading machine, and the bending strength was tested according to EN 408. Models for prediction of bending strength based on machine strength grading and x-ray LogScanner measurements were calibrated using partial least squares regression. The study showed that the x-ray LogScanner (r2 = 0.44) and machine strength grading (r2 = 0.43) had similar accuracy in predicting bending strength. The combination of both methods resulted in significantly higher accuracy (r2 = 0.56). The root mean square error (RMSE) was 8.5 MPa for the bending machine, 8.4 MPa for the x-ray LogScanner, and 7.4 MPa for the combination of both methods. Consequently, the combination is an interesting alternative. Future studies should include a larger number of boards and focus on the effect of log carriers and on finding the reasons behind outliers

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 55, no 9, 55-60 p.
National Category
Other Mechanical Engineering
Research subject
Wood Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-12849Local ID: bff24680-bb52-11db-b560-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-12849DiVA: diva2:985800
Note
Validerad; 2005; 20061017 (cira)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2017-11-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2673 kB)37 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2673 kBChecksum SHA-512
3471896ac77ed501bae1a86daa50e01c97512a6a144f151bc976f2d9603533a8fb5c5214f9be74e3b13fe1cfc8f4e35bba77254dc08ba377bb070ec95e592572
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Oja, JohanGrundberg, Stig
By organisation
Wood Science and Engineering
In the same journal
Forest products journal
Other Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 37 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf