Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Empirical challenges in the use of learning curves for assessing the economic prospects of renewable energy technologies
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2264-7043
Swedish Competition Authority.
2007 (English)In: Renewable energy, ISSN 0960-1481, E-ISSN 1879-0682, Vol. 32, no 15, 2559-2578 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In bottom-up energy models endogenous technical change is introduced by implementing technology learning rates, which specify the quantitative relationship between the cumulative experiences of the technology on the one hand and cost reductions on the other. The main purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the choice of modeling and estimation strategies in learning curve analyses of power generation costs. We identify and discuss a number of theoretical and econometric issues involved in the estimation of learning curves. These include the presence of omitted variable bias and simultaneity, but also methodological problems related to the operationalization of theoretical concepts (i.e., learning-by-doing) and the associated use of data. We illustrate the importance of these issues by employing panel data for wind power installations in four western European countries, which are used to compare the results from different learning curve model specifications. The results illustrate that the estimates of learning rates may differ significantly across different model specifications and econometric approaches. The paper ends by outlining a number of recommendations for energy model analysts, who need to select appropriate energy technology learning rates from the empirical literature, or who choose to perform the empirical work themselves.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 32, no 15, 2559-2578 p.
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-6515DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2006.12.007Local ID: 4be0e6c0-8933-11dc-8a55-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-6515DiVA: diva2:979400
Note

Validerad; 2007; 20071102 (patrik_s)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2017-11-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(226 kB)94 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 226 kBChecksum SHA-512
2f64f995d32ab9d608ce1d6d8e15980dc922b130035aaa76d2b467038f82d4df7aa010d2d9b3469cc550c691f2a2c311e94cea221b3afa91f714e7caaecc241a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Söderholm, Patrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Söderholm, Patrik
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
Renewable energy
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 94 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 60 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf