Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of Different Assembling Techniques Regarding Cost, Durability, and Ecology: A Survey of Multi-layer Wooden Panel Assembly Load-Bearing Construction Elements
Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7091-6696
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5872-2792
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8404-7356
SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, SP Sustainable Built Environment, Skellefteå, Sweden.
Number of Authors: 4
2015 (English)In: BioResources, ISSN 1930-2126, E-ISSN 1930-2126, Vol. 10, no 4, 8378-8396 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Wood is a pure, sustainable, renewable material. The increasing use of wood for construction can improve its sustainability. There are various techniques to assemble multi-layer wooden panels into prefabricated, load-bearing construction elements. However, comparative market and economy studies are still scarce. In this study, the following assembling techniques were compared: laminating, nailing, stapling, screwing, stress laminating, doweling, dovetailing, and wood welding. The production costs, durability, and ecological considerations were presented. This study was based on reviews of published works and information gathered from 27 leading wood product manufacturing companies in six European countries. The study shows that the various techniques of assembling multi-layer wooden construction panel elements are very different. Cross laminated timber (CLT) exhibited the best results in terms of cost and durability. With regard to ecological concerns, dovetailing is the best. Taking into account both durability and ecological considerations, wooden screw-doweling is the best. These alternatives give manufacturers some freedom of choice regarding the visibility of surfaces and the efficient use of lower-quality timber. CLT is the most cost-effective, is not patented, and is a well-established option on the market today.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 10, no 4, 8378-8396 p.
National Category
Other Mechanical Engineering
Research subject
Wood Science and Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-6194DOI: 10.15376/biores.10.4.8378-8396ISI: 000366990800160Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85011309055Local ID: 46395d70-95a9-4286-9834-bb37c6c45a47OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-6194DiVA: diva2:979071
Note

Validerad; 2015; Nivå 2; 20150827 (aliwan)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2017-11-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(835 kB)158 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 835 kBChecksum SHA-512
a012b85dc02843d496345db758f3ce08f76c4c47e70e5bae1ba98fdd7a8a3516ee64cc28882ff214fe62ba3a54d86e739f8fc36f64aaee22e7add1434e6f8c19
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Buck, DietrichWang, Xiaodong (Alice)Hagman, Olle
By organisation
Wood Science and Engineering
In the same journal
BioResources
Other Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 158 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 862 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf