Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Tissue communication in a systemic immune response of Drosophila.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology (Faculty of Medicine).
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology (Faculty of Medicine). BioMediTech, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
2016 (English)In: Fly, ISSN 1933-6942, Vol. 10, no 3, 115-122 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Several signaling pathways, including the JAK/STAT and Toll pathways, are known to activate blood cells (hemocytes) in Drosophila melanogaster larvae. They are believed to regulate the immune response against infections by parasitoid wasps, such as Leptopilina boulardi, but how these pathways control the hemocytes is not well understood. Here, we discuss the recent discovery that both muscles and fat body take an active part in this response. Parasitoid wasp infection induces Upd2 and Upd3 secretion from hemocytes, leading to JAK/STAT activation mainly in hemocytes and in skeletal muscles. JAK/STAT activation in muscles, but not in hemocytes, is required for an efficient encapsulation of wasp eggs. This suggests that Upd2 and Upd3 are important cytokines, coordinating different tissues for the cellular immune response in Drosophila. In the fat body, Toll signaling initiates a systemic response in which hemocytes are mobilized and activated hemocytes (lamellocytes) are generated. However, the contribution of Toll signaling to the defense against wasps is limited, probably because the wasps inject inhibitors that prevent the activation of the Toll pathway. In conclusion, parasite infection induces a systemic response in Drosophila larvae involving major organ systems and probably the physiology of the entire organism.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis, 2016. Vol. 10, no 3, 115-122 p.
Keyword [en]
Drosophila, fat body, JAK, STAT, muscles, tissue communication, Toll
National Category
Medical Biotechnology (with a focus on Cell Biology (including Stem Cell Biology), Molecular Biology, Microbiology, Biochemistry or Biopharmacy)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-125879DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2016.1182269ISI: 000381307600003PubMedID: 27116253OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-125879DiVA: diva2:972493
Available from: 2016-09-21 Created: 2016-09-21 Last updated: 2016-11-25Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Drosophila skeletal muscles regulate the cellular immune response against wasp infection
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Drosophila skeletal muscles regulate the cellular immune response against wasp infection
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Drosophila melanogaster is widely used as a model organism to study the innate immune system because it lacks an adaptive immune response that could mask its innate immune response. The innate immune response of Drosophila primarily consists of humoral and cellular immune responses. The humoral immune response ismediated by antimicrobial peptides, and is induced by bacterial and fungal infections. The cellular immune response is mediated by blood cells (hemocytes), and is induced by bacterial and wasp infection. While the humoral immune response of Drosophila has been studied extensively, the cellular immune response is less well understood.

In this work, I investigated the communication between different signaling pathways and tissues in Drosophila during infection by the parasitic wasp Leptopilina boulardi. I find that JAK/STAT signaling is strongly activated by wasp infection, in both hemocytes and (unexpectedly) larval skeletal muscles. This activation is mediated by the cytokines Upd2 and Upd3, which are secreted from circulating hemocytes. Deletion of upd2 or/and upd3 weakens the wasp-induced activation of JAK/STAT signaling in skeletal muscles and the cellular immune response to wasp infection, leading to reduced encapsulation of wasp eggs and a decrease in the number of circulating lamelloyctes. The suppression of JAK/STAT signaling also significantly weakens the cellular immune response in skeletal muscles, but not in fat bodies and hemocytes. However, the activation of this signaling in skeletal muscles has no obvious effect on the cellular immune response. Together, these results suggest that rather than being uninvolved bystanders, Drosophila skeletal musclesactively participate in cellular immune responses against wasp infection.

To answer how Drosophila larval muscles participate cellular immune response, I min-screened the effects of several immune related signaling pathways in the muscles and the fat body on the cellular immune response. Interestingly, the cellular immune response was only significantly compromised by the suppression ofinsulin signaling in skeletal muscles, in a way that was veryreminiscent of the phenotypes induced by suppressing JAK/STAT signaling in muscles. While wasp infection activates JAK/STAT signaling in muscles, it has the opposite effect on insulin signaling. In addition, I find that insulin signaling in skeletal muscles can positively regulate JAK/STAT signaling. On the other hand, suppression of JAK/STAT signaling in muscles reduces insulin signaling locally in muscles and systemically in the fat body. Suppression of either insulin or JAK/STAT signaling in muscles leads to reductions in glycogen storage in muscles, the trehalose concentration in the hemolymph, and the frequency of feeding behavior. All these results indicate that JAK/STAT and insulin signaling in Drosophila skeletal muscles regulate cellular immune responses via their effects on carbohydrate metabolism. Our findings shed new light on the interactions between diabetes, metabolism, the immune system, and tissue communication.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2016. 43 p.
Series
Doctoral thesis / Umeå University, Department of Molecular Biology, 1818Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612
National Category
Cell and Molecular Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-125842 (URN)978-91-7601-508-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2016-10-11, hörsal E04, NUS 6A–L Biomedicinhuset, Byggnad 6E,, Umeå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2016-09-20 Created: 2016-09-20 Last updated: 2016-09-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1105 kB)18 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1105 kBChecksum SHA-512
bd127174a84f5847d71033858a1857dade92c99618fed9985fd1b9eb89d76f5803f767863ff8225b1f713866ad9cb8c2cb5591c370b4359ff5055c12ae1efa7e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Yang, HairuHultmark, Dan
By organisation
Department of Molecular Biology (Faculty of Medicine)
Medical Biotechnology (with a focus on Cell Biology (including Stem Cell Biology), Molecular Biology, Microbiology, Biochemistry or Biopharmacy)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 18 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 50 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link