Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Semantic Processing in Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children: Large N400 Mismatch Effects in Brain Responses, Despite Poor Semantic Ability
Stockholm University, Sweden; Lund University, Sweden.
Stockholm University, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research.
Lund University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, ISSN 1664-1078, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 7, no 1146Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Difficulties in auditory and phonological processing affect semantic processing in speech comprehension for deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children. However, little is known about brain responses related to semantic processing in this group. We investigated event-related potentials (ERPs) in DHH children with cochlear implants (CIs) and/or hearing aids (HAs), and in normally hearing controls (NH). We used a semantic priming task with spoken word primes followed by picture targets. In both DHH children and controls, cortical response differences between matching and mismatching targets revealed a typical N400 effect associated with semantic processing. Children with CI had the largest mismatch response despite poor semantic abilities overall; Children with CIalso had the largest ERP differentiation between mismatch types, with small effects in within-category mismatch trials (target from same category as prime) and large effects in between category mismatch trials (where target is from a different category than prime), compared to matching trials. Children with NH and HA had similar responses to both mismatch types. While the large and differentiated ERP responses in the CI group were unexpected and should be interpreted with caution, the results could reflect less precision in semantic processing among children with CI, or a stronger reliance on predictive processing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA , 2016. Vol. 7, no 1146
Keyword [en]
children; cochlear implants; hearing aids; semantics; N400 evoked potential
National Category
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-131165DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01146ISI: 000381093100001PubMedID: 27559320OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-131165DiVA: diva2:972175
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Research Council for Working Life and Social Sciences (Forskningsradet for Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap); Linneaus Center HEAD at Linkoping University; Cognition, Communication and Learning (CCL) at Lund University

Available from: 2016-09-20 Created: 2016-09-12 Last updated: 2017-11-21

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2527 kB)