Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Towards a multi-perspective research program on projects and temporary organizations: Analyzing the Scandinavian turn and the rethinking effort
Umeå School of Business and Economics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2629-6968
Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
2016 (English)In: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business/Emerald, ISSN 1753-8378, E-ISSN 1753-8386, Vol. 9, no 4, 752-766 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]


The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyze important parts of the contemporary development of project research and to outline plausible and desirable directions for the future.


This is accomplished through a review of the “Scandinavian School of Project Management” and “Rethinking Project Management,” which is complemented with a set of questions distributed to 27 active researchers within the project research field from around the world.


Through the analysis the authors show how the two streams have more similarities than differences, despite the fact that they have been initiated in very different contexty 8ts and ways. The authors could also conclude that the “Scandinavian School” appears stronger on the international scene than in the Nordic countries, and that general perception of what the “school” stands for has changed and been blurred with time. Based on the analysis the authors also proposed the need for a broad, more coherent research effort in terms of a multi-perspective research program on projects and temporary organizations. The essence of this would be: an action research profile to improve practice and foresee the future; a combined research focus on institutional change and project practice to ensure both theoretical and empirical progress; and a strong global perspective to further enrich both theory and practice.

Research limitations/implications

This research has obvious limitations in terms of empirical scope and response selection. The questionnaire results should therefore be interpreted with care.


The value of this research lies in its reflective nature and the proposed trajectory of the project research domain.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 9, no 4, 752-766 p.
Keyword [en]
Project management, Development, Projects, Temporary organizations, Future directions, Scandinavian School of Project Management
National Category
Business Administration
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-31708DOI: 10.1108/IJMPB-10-2015-0100ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84985028705OAI: diva2:967567
Available from: 2016-09-09 Created: 2016-09-09 Last updated: 2016-09-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Accepted Manuscript(329 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 329 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundin, Rolf A.
By organisation
Jönköping International Business School
In the same journal
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business/Emerald
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 49 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link