Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Oral and Written Teacher Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Classroom in Sweden
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education.
2016 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

When teaching English as a foreign language (EFL), teachers use feedback in order to help students to improve their English skills. They can use both oral and written feedback to encourage students to make progress. Oral and written feedback play a significant role in second language acquisition, and this study could raise teachers' awareness of the different feedback strategies that can be employed in EFL classrooms. This could benefit their teaching performance and students’ learning. This study aims to examine the different types of oral and written feedback used in the EFL classroom, as well as teachers’ own perceptions of feedback. The approach used to conduct this study was both quantitative and qualitative. Three types of data material were collected in a secondary school (grades 7-9) for the analysis: three secondary school teachers were interviewed; their English lessons were observed; and their feedback on student essays was collected. The material collected was used in the analysis, which indicated that the teachers used different types of feedback. The most frequent oral feedback types used were recast, elicitation, and praise. However, the teachers employed different strategies regarding to how they provide this feedback. Two of the teachers provided feedback in the traditional way by using corrective types of feedback frequently, while one teacher chose not to correct students too often and instead encouraged them by giving them praise. The evaluation of different feedback types performed in this study suggests that recast as an implicit feedback type provided orally could be more effective in a communicative classroom setting, as it does not interrupt the communicative flow. In writing, on the other hand, explicit feedback combined with face-to-face sessions could lead to better results. It would be interesting to investigate in further research the effects of different oral and written feedback types.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. , 35 p.
Keyword [en]
EFL, oral feedback, corrective feedback, written feedback
National Category
Specific Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-55719OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-55719DiVA: diva2:954880
Educational program
Supplementary educational programme, 90 credits
Presentation
(English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2016-08-25 Created: 2016-08-23 Last updated: 2016-08-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(833 kB)7 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 833 kBChecksum SHA-512
cd55b39646713870779b29fb7c38d15ac249ab9436059225cf59654e76137738b16572fb6cbe6ebe7da753fbd396227d150c8120e93c72611fb869a6e15ff1e3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Education
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 7 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 5 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link