Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rurality and Collective Attitude Effects on Wolf Policy
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science. Umeå University.
2016 (English)In: Sustainability, ISSN 2071-1050, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 8, no 8, 711Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Debates over wolf policy are driven by an underlying attitudinal divide between peoplefrom urban and rural areas. This study explores how the power relationship between urban and ruralgroups interact with individual attitude formation in relation to wolf policy, in order to understandwhy dissatisfaction with wolf policy tends to result in group level conflict patterns. Using Swedishsurvey data, I analyze attitudes to wolf policy, in relation to collective level effects and rural politicalalienation. Findings indicate that individual level attitudes towards the Swedish wolf policy are inpart determined by collective attitude patterns: effects that could be contingent on political alienation.This highlights the possibility of reducing attitude polarization with respect to the wolf policy,by addressing political alienation among the rural population.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Basel: MDPI , 2016. Vol. 8, no 8, 711
Keyword [en]
wolf, rural-urban divide, political alienation, rurality, conservation policy, collective attitude effects
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
Research subject
statskunskap
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-124743DOI: 10.3390/su8080711ISI: 000382452900013OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-124743DiVA: diva2:954677
Projects
Governing sustainable rural development – for or by the local population?
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 251-2011-117
Available from: 2016-08-23 Created: 2016-08-23 Last updated: 2016-12-16Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Changing attitudes to Swedish wolf policy: wolf return, rural areas, and political alienation
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Changing attitudes to Swedish wolf policy: wolf return, rural areas, and political alienation
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In 1966, the grey wolf was listed as a protected species in Sweden. Since then, the Swedish wolf population has increased in size, making human-wolf encounters more common, particularly in rural areas. Previous qualitative research has shown that segments of the rural population perceive the wolf to be incompatible with traditional rural life. Some also believe that the return of the wolf was orchestrated by urban interests, and perceive the wolf policy as a vehicle for the consolidation of urban power in rural areas. Thus, the return of the wolf can be assumed to aggravate pre-existing urban-rural tensions, resulting in conflicts over wolf policy, which Swedish wolf governance could be ill-equipped to handle. In view of this, this thesis is an examination of,

how environmental, socio-political, and institutional factors affect varia-tions in public attitudes to the Swedish wolf policy over time, and discuss their policy implications.

Drawing on extensive survey material collected in Sweden in 2004, 2009, and 2014, the wolf policy is approached from a political science perspective. This thesis is an attempt to bridge a number of existing gaps in literature related to wolves and policy, individual and collective level explanatory factors, and attitude change. The underlying assumption is that environmental, socio-political and institutional factors are likely to impact attitudes to wolf policy. Environmental change is found to be relevant, as direct experiences with wolf have increased over time, a development that was also associated with an increase of support for a more restrictive wolf policy (Paper I). Regarding socio-political change, politically alienated individuals were less likely to support the current wolf policy, and more likely to favor either more, or less restrictive policy options compared to other individuals. Rural areas displayed higher levels of political alienation than urban areas, and people living in rural areas were more likely to favor a more restrictive wolf policy (Paper II). Furthermore, individuals living in municipalities in which a high proportion of residents had grown up in a rural area, tended to favor a more restrictive wolf policy, an effect which could also be associated with political alienation (Paper III). Finally, institutional change was examined through an analysis of public support for the actors within the Wildlife Management Delegations (WMDs). In general, the interest groups represented in WMDs where found to reflect the representation preferred by the public. However, findings show a fundamental value divide in relation to natural resources, among the Swedish public, which is also reflected within the WMDs (Paper IV).

The return of the wolf has caused part of the general public to want fewer wolves in Sweden. This attitudinal change is related to a growing divide between urban-rural areas in Sweden, and associated with a general pattern of political alienation. Thus, the wolf policy has become a symbolic issue around which rural citizens rally their fight against urban interests for political autonomy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2016. 62 p.
Series
Statsvetenskapliga institutionens skriftserie, ISSN 0349-0831 ; 2016:4
Keyword
attitude change, political alienation, urban-rural conflict, governance, wolf policy
National Category
Political Science
Research subject
statskunskap
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-128861 (URN)978-91-7601-632-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
2017-01-20, Hörsal C, Lindellhallen, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2016-12-21 Created: 2016-12-16 Last updated: 2017-01-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(586 kB)39 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 586 kBChecksum SHA-512
8b6fadd6d78768dbe0fbb59eeb08b4d79d55ea20ae87ce1f53cbea1645d629f15e6b05f75c9d6dc0c84eb4ee610b99f1f767f3554fc2aaf2b4439559e4d8fc0f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/8/711/htm

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, Max
By organisation
Department of Political Science
In the same journal
Sustainability
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 39 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 91 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf