Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Acute effects of loaded whole body vibration schemes on countermovement jump, speed and agility
College of Human Kinetics, University of the Philippines.
School of Physical Education and Sport, University of Tuzla.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9554-1234
School of Physical Education and Sport, University of Tuzla.
School of Physical Education and Sport, University of Tuzla.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, ISSN 2147-5652, Vol. 13, no 3, 56-59 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of loaded whole body static squat exercise during whole body vibration and non-vibration schemes on countermovement jump (CMJ), speed and agility. Twenty-one healthy male college football players (age: 20.14 ± 1.65 years; body height: 179.9 ± 8.34 cm; body mass: 74.4 ± 13.0 kg; % body fat: 9.45 ± 4.8) participated in the study. They underwent a standardized general warm-up and dynamic stretching followed by randomized loaded protocols executed for 5 minutes with a rest interval of 30 seconds. These included static squat with 30% bodyweight external load (ST + 30%), ST + 30% on a vibration platform at 25 Hz and 2 mm (WBV25), and  ST + 30% on a vibration platform at 50 Hz and 4mm. Measurement of  CMJ, 15 m sprint and modified agility tests followed the warm-up protocol. One way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant difference on CMJ performance, F(2,40) = 24.5, partial Î·2 =  .551, p < 0.01. Bonferonni post hoc showed that ST+30% posted significantly lower CMJ than WBV25 and WBV50. CMJ at WBV50 was higher than WBV25. There was a significant difference on speed, F(2, 40) = 23.6, partial η2  = .542, p < 0.01. Post hoc determined that ST+30% was significantly slower than WBV25 and WBV50. WBV50 was faster than WBV25. There was a significant difference in the agility among interventions, F(2, 40) = 18.2, partial η2 = .477, p < 0.01. ST+30% agility time was significantly higher compared to WBV25 and WBV50.  In conclusion, WBV50 posted the greatest benefits in CMJ, speed and agility.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 13, no 3, 56-59 p.
Keyword [en]
Football; warm-up; vibration training
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-28567OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-28567DiVA: diva2:954135
Available from: 2016-08-20 Created: 2016-08-20 Last updated: 2016-08-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(546 kB)10 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 546 kBChecksum SHA-512
0e221990bd4998ffcfbf67e67c6b322bdb206232083efa49ff78a66fd38ee2dee8116bf611161d536f7bb9296920a733ac101ab0d5db33ef6c83ef84c832e823
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/tsed/article/view/1091000020

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pojskic, Haris
Sport and Fitness Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 10 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 12 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link