Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Panoptisism, Mina jag och Maskerna: En studie om teknologisk och direkt övervakning i kontorslandskap
Halmstad University, School of Health and Welfare.
Halmstad University, School of Health and Welfare.
2016 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Panopticism, me, myself and the masks (English)
Abstract [en]

The  purpose of the study was to enhance the understanding of what is affected and eligible technology and the direct supervision of the offices on the basis of the employee's perspective. Where the issues were the following:

 

What legitimizes the technology and the direct supervision according to the workers?

How does the integrity of the employee's effekt the acceptance of the technology and the direct supervision of the open plan offices? 

 

To carry out the study, participated twelve workers from two different organizations. The material consisted of previous research, surveillance and privacy as well as two theories. The theories consisted of Michel Foucault's theory of panopticism and Erving Goffman's theory, self in everyday life. The method had a qualitative approach where individual interviews were used as the basis for the results.

The study showed that workers felt the monitoring to be legitimated when it was preceded by acceptable arguments, such as increased security and improved economy. The study showed that the surveillance was accepted easier if the employee had to be involved in the implementation of new monitoring, as well as receive information on the monitoring presence and purpose. The study also showed that workers on the basis of individual perspective, was more difficult to accept especially technological monitoring as it increasingly considered to be a threat to the integrity than the direct monitoring. However, there was a greater acceptance of the direct monitoring based on organizational perspective, because it was considered more important to protect the organization than to protect the individual's privacy. If the individual deviated from the norm it could damage the organization and therefore other workers.

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. , 34 p.
Keyword [sv]
Integritet, övervakning, Panoptisism, kontorslandskap, arbetstagare
National Category
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-31077OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-31077DiVA: diva2:934858
Subject / course
Work Science
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2016-06-14 Created: 2016-06-09 Last updated: 2016-06-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(579 kB)29 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 579 kBChecksum SHA-512
d369f87a8b13ebda8f500ffdb587188ec93adf5f33cd260499130fdfecbf1fe4da31fa2d6ec3730f45147c6f73ac3411395fb478420d22ab2b31346f0414e772
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Health and Welfare
Philosophy, Ethics and ReligionSociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 29 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 64 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf