Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Role of state weakness in customary conflict resolution: Case of Kenya and Tanzania
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Peace and Conflict Research.
2016 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The only way to resolve existing conflicts, mitigate consequences and reduce risks of their reoccurrence is to have efficient instrument for justice delivering. In many weak states and areas across the globe factual absence of a state’s infrastructure, corrupt court system and unbearable litigation costs leave conflict parties no other option, but to resort to violence. It forces affected population to seek for alternative dispute resolution mechanisms (ADRs). In African societies, especially in rural areas, the answer is frequently found in Customary Conflict Resolution (CCR). Customary conflict resolution, in many cases, is the only present means preventing bloodshed and consequent spiral of violence. This thesis tries to find out how does state weakness affect usage of customary conflict resolution mechanisms, attempting to underline importance of coexisting of the both. I propose two contradictory hypotheses: H1 – state weakness will have positive correlation with CCRs usage, and H2 – state weakness will have negative correlation with CCRs usage. I argue then that only the H1, widely accepted by scholars, will hold true. I test my main argument on two segments of the Kuria tribe living across the border in Kenya and Tanzania. Surprisingly, the main argument is not supported by the research results, indicating that state weakness doesn’t increase usage of CCRs in the selected cases. Moreover, by finding support for the H2 in case of Tanzania, I assume that a stronger state will have higher usage of customary conflict resolution mechanisms. Therefore, the research contributes to both theoretical and practical domains – academia (by testing existing theories and challenging widely accepted causal story) and policy (by suggesting CCR-related tactics for grassroots NGOs and respective national governments).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. , 53 p.
Keyword [en]
Ebharaza, Baraza, CCR, ADR, Africa
National Category
Social Sciences Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-294797OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-294797DiVA: diva2:931385
Subject / course
Peace and Conflict Studies
Educational program
Master Programme in Social Sciences
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2016-10-20 Created: 2016-05-27 Last updated: 2016-10-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(535 kB)29 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 535 kBChecksum SHA-512
15e314019ad999b26ad741a2037807a9f30172778836eca4095a56838a06f929940401eba55f6118d7683fa73a86c75f49fba3747fb20f875f235551fd62def3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Peace and Conflict Research
Social SciencesOther Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 29 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 33 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link