Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
PROJEKTERING MED TVÅDIMENSIONELLA ELLER TREDIMENSIONELLA RITNINGAR: En jämförelse baserad på konsulters erfarenhet
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering.
2016 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

More and more companies within the building sector are using BIM (Building Information Model). This degree project has the increased use of BIM as a background, but the work is mainly focused on possibilities and limitations specifically for the work with 3D (three-dimensional drawings). The purpose of this study is to compare the work and costs in practice when working with drawings in 2D or 3D. In addition to a literature study, drawings from a particular building are compared, where the original 2D drawings are converted into 3D. Investigations using interviews and questionnaires have been made including several different companies where the respondents have different professions. The answers were really useful, and the results are mainly based on these answers. Conducting all investigations and compiling all the answers gave a balanced picture mainly regarding the work with 3D in practice. One important result is that one should distinguish between BIM and 3D, where BIM is equivalent to a work approach that is recommended primarily for larger projects where you have the possibility to save large sums of money. The advantages and disadvantages between 2D and 3D drawings depends on how you are as a person and how much experience you have with the different software. Moreover, there is no exact figure that explains the economic gain or loss specifically by using 2D or 3D. Results and experiences of this work, however, suggests that in the fairly near future only 3D will be used.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. , 72 p.
Keyword [sv]
2D, 3D, BIM, AutoCAD, Revit, projekt, BIM-process
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-31497OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-31497DiVA: diva2:925873
External cooperation
Grontmij AB
Subject / course
Building Engineering
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2016-06-02 Created: 2016-05-03 Last updated: 2016-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1824 kB)104 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1824 kBChecksum SHA-512
6bf716990cf0f430b0f7215e15d35a39adb86d5c73d4c4b744056818ec439aa7e175d416c203d6598f3e1afe353dce4e75aa7aac5fc615f28af1be3db2875530
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Business, Society and Engineering
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 106 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 236 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf