Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prediction of the machine tool errors under quasi-static load: Developing methodology through the synthesis of bottom-up and top-down modeling approach
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Production Engineering.
2015 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

One of the biggest challenges in the manufacturing industry is to increase the understanding of the sources of the errors and their effects on machining systems accuracy. In this thesis a new robust empirical evaluation method is developed to predict the machine tool errors under quasi-static load including the effect of the variation of stiffness in the workspace, the geometric and the kinematic errors. These errors are described through combined computational models for a more accurate assessment of the machine tool’s capability. The purpose of this thesis is to establish such methodology through the synthesis of the bottom-up and the top-down modeling approach, which consists the combination of the direct (single axis measurements by laser interferometer) and indirect (multi-axis measurements by loaded double ball-bar) measurement technics. The bottom-up modeling method with the direct measurement was applied to predict the effects of the geometric and kinematic errors in the workspace of a machine tool. The top-down modeling method with the indirect measurement was employed to evaluate the variation of the static stiffness in the workspace of a machine tool. The thesis presents a case study demonstrating the applicability of the proposed approach. The evaluation technic extended for machine tools with various kinematic structures. The methodology was implemented on a three and a five axis machine tool and the results expose the potential of the approach.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 58 p.
Series
Degree Project in Production Engineering Management, Second Level, 665
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-186143OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-186143DiVA: diva2:925671
Examiners
Available from: 2016-05-03 Created: 2016-05-03 Last updated: 2016-05-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3388 kB)239 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3388 kBChecksum SHA-512
c087c42aa33f51f82f4542807a98396154fb517ce66db5a948ffb534a877c36d30dfc91d7bb8a3c184731663b873e851035f0e4eb291879679a9994918e36586
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Production Engineering
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 239 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 90 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf