Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Large-scale hydrological modelling by using modified PUB recommendations: the India-HYPE case
SMHI, Research Department, Hydrology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3416-317X
SMHI, Research Department, Hydrology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8314-0735
2015 (English)In: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, ISSN 1027-5606, E-ISSN 1607-7938, Vol. 19, no 11, 4559-4579 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

The scientific initiative Prediction in Ungauged Basins (PUB) (2003-2012 by the IAHS) put considerable effort into improving the reliability of hydrological models to predict flow response in ungauged rivers. PUB's collective experience advanced hydrologic science and defined guidelines to make predictions in catchments without observed runoff data. At present, there is a raised interest in applying catchment models to large domains and large data samples in a multi-basin manner, to explore emerging spatial patterns or learn from comparative hydrology. However, such modelling involves additional sources of uncertainties caused by the inconsistency between input data sets, i.e. particularly regional and global databases. This may lead to inaccurate model parameterisation and erroneous process understanding. In order to bridge the gap between the best practices for flow predictions in single catchments and multi-basins at the large scale, we present a further developed and slightly modified version of the recommended best practices for PUB by Takeuchi et al. (2013). By using examples from a recent HYPE (Hydrological Predictions for the Environment) hydrological model set-up across 6000 subbasins for the Indian subcontinent, named India-HYPE v1.0, we explore the PUB recommendations, identify challenges and recommend ways to overcome them. We describe the work process related to (a) errors and inconsistencies in global databases, unknown human impacts, and poor data quality; (b) robust approaches to identify model parameters using a stepwise calibration approach, remote sensing data, expert knowledge, and catchment similarities; and (c) evaluation based on flow signatures and performance metrics, using both multiple criteria and multiple variables, and independent gauges for "blind tests". The results show that despite the strong physiographical gradient over the subcontinent, a single model can describe the spatial variability in dominant hydrological processes at the catchment scale. In addition, spatial model deficiencies are used to identify potential improvements of the model concept. Eventually, through simultaneous calibration using numerous gauges, the median Kling-Gupta efficiency for river flow increased from 0.14 to 0.64. We finally demonstrate the potential of multi-basin modelling for comparative hydrology using PUB, by grouping the 6000 subbasins based on similarities in flow signatures to gain insights into the spatial patterns of flow generating processes at the large scale.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 19, no 11, 4559-4579 p.
National Category
Oceanography, Hydrology, Water Resources
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:smhi:diva-1939DOI: 10.5194/hess-19-4559-2015ISI: 000365981100011OAI: diva2:924801
Available from: 2016-04-29 Created: 2016-03-03 Last updated: 2016-04-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(6176 kB)17 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 6176 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pechlivanidis, IliasArheimer, Berit
By organisation
In the same journal
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Oceanography, Hydrology, Water Resources

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 17 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 24 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link