Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Hlth & Caring Sci, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden..
Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Sahlgrenska Acad, Perinatal Ctr,Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Inst Clin Sci, S-41685 Gothenburg, Sweden..
Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Hlth & Caring Sci, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden..
Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Sahlgrenska Acad, Perinatal Ctr,Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Inst Clin Sci, S-41685 Gothenburg, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, ISSN 1471-2393, E-ISSN 1471-2393, Vol. 16, 49Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Background: Observational data shows that postterm pregnancy (>= 42 gestational weeks, GW) and late term pregnancy (>= 41 GW), as compared to term pregnancy, is associated with an increased risk for adverse outcome for the mother and infant. Standard care in many countries is induction of labour at 42 GW. There is insufficient scientific support that induction of labour at 41 GW, as compared with expectant management and induction at 42 GW will reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity without an increase in operative deliveries, negative delivery experiences or higher costs. Large randomised studies are needed since important outcomes; such as perinatal mortality and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy are rare events. Methods/Design: A total of 10 038 healthy women >= 18 years old with a normal live singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation at 41 GW estimated with a first or second trimester ultrasound, who is able to understand oral and written information will be randomised to labour induction at 41 GW (early induction) or expectant management and induction at 42 GW (late induction). Women will be recruited at university clinics and county hospitals in Sweden comprising more than 65 000 deliveries per year. Primary outcome will be a composite of stillbirth, neonatal mortality and severe neonatal morbidity. Secondary outcomes will be other adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes, mode of delivery, women's experience, cost effectiveness and infant morbidity up to 3 months of age. Data on background variables, obstetric and neonatal outcomes will be obtained from the Swedish Pregnancy Register and the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register. Data on women's experiences will be collected by questionnaires after randomisation and 3 months after delivery. Primary analysis will be intention to treat. The statistician will be blinded to group and intervention. Discussion: It is important to investigate if an intervention at 41 GW is superior to standard care in order to reduce death and lifelong disability for the children. The pregnant population, >41 GW, constitutes 15-20 % of all pregnancies and the results of the study will thus have a great impact. The use of registries for randomisation and collection of outcome data represents a unique and new study design.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 16, 49
Keyword [en]
Prolonged pregnancy, Postterm, Labour, Induced, Expectant management, Perinatal outcome, Neonatal outcome, Maternal outcome, Maternal preferences
National Category
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-282461DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0836-9ISI: 000371575400001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-282461DiVA: diva2:917180
Available from: 2016-04-05 Created: 2016-04-05 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(692 kB)54 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 692 kBChecksum SHA-512
86b44ac915336ad5eab7e1d5f3affda798bc56c5a52e08cec12bf33297169f22b4cc05158ff3be31f49521aed6425840bd651b08bb417c081d11ac3bae2d7e40
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wikström, Anna-Karin
By organisation
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
In the same journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 54 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 208 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf