Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Ecosystem Approach to Management in Baltic Sea Governance : towards increased reflexivity?
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7215-2623
Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden.
2016 (English)In: Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea / [ed] M. Gilek, M. Karlsson, S. Linke, K. Smolarz, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2016, 149-172 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This chapter analyses the governance structures linked to the marine environment of the Baltic Sea. The purpose is to assess whether current developments of the governance structures have a potential to take into account requirements of an Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM). We use the concept of reflexive governance to understand key components and weaknesses in contemporary governance modes, as well as to elaborate on possible pathways towards a governance mode more aligned with EAM. The reflexive governance framework highlights three elements: (1) acknowledgement of uncertainty and ambiguity; (2) a holistic approach in terms of scales, sectors and actors; and (3) acknowledgement of path dependency and incremental policy-making. Our analysis is based on a comparative case study approach, including analysis of the governance in five environmental risk areas: chemical pollution, overfishing, eutrophication, invasive alien species and pollution from shipping. The chapter highlights an existing governance mode that is ill-equipped to deal with the complexity of environmental problems in a holistic manner, with systematic attention to uncertainty, plurality of values, ambiguity and limited knowledge, while also pointing at important recent cognitive and institutional developments that can favour pathways towards refl exive governance and consequently EAM.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2016. 149-172 p.
Keyword [en]
Baltic Sea, ecosystem approach to management, holistic approach, marine governance, reflexive governance
National Category
Social Sciences Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-49476ISBN: 9789401772785 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-49476DiVA: diva2:914757
Available from: 2016-03-25 Created: 2016-03-25 Last updated: 2017-10-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(319 kB)112 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 319 kBChecksum SHA-512
7aec9b82d920a9ec9bd6ae46993d036090b40da6d6b03665a408b27d758ec5ceebfee841e91aad9be274c5d066d2503ff7b84938985509a8f93ff435b6e3d8d0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Boström, Magnus
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences
Social SciencesSociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 112 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 424 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf