Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ecological restoration success: a policy analysis understanding
Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales U.K..
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6546-5210
2016 (English)In: Restoration Ecology, ISSN 1061-2971, E-ISSN 1526-100X, Vol. 24, no 3, 284-290 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article discusses how ecological restoration success can be understood and evaluated using a policy analysis lens. First, this article details a conceptual tool that helps to develop a more encompassing set of criteria to assess restoration activities that provide socioeconomic benefits. Second, by broadening the understanding of restoration success and how it can be evaluated, it allows a more critical view of evaluation itself and its uses as a policy tool. A table is presented that can help practitioners reveal preferences and clarify the aims and objectives of particular initiatives. The table also sensitizes practitioners to the complexity of the links between restoration rationales and evaluation criteria, which in turn may open up much needed discussion and dialogue between restoration participants about the underlying values an actor may wish to promote. It heightens awareness of the fact that evaluation methods need to recognize that restoration is driven by multiple rationales often in the same project, both process driven and output oriented, which in turn can change over time. Adding process and output criteria together may also raise issues of priority. Evaluation criteria thus need to be assigned in ways that reflect these multiplicities, while at the same time recognizing that some restoration values might be conflictual and that there may be winners and losers. Furthermore, judgement about "failure" of a project can change as new goals emerge in delivery and implementation. Ecological restoration evaluation should therefore be ongoing, contextual, and not a one-off event.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. Vol. 24, no 3, 284-290 p.
Keyword [en]
ecological restoration success, ecological restoration values, evaluation criteria, restoration process, socioeconomic benefits
National Category
Ecology Environmental Sciences Political Science
Research subject
Political Science; statskunskap
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-117541DOI: 10.1111/rec.12339ISI: 000383716800001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-117541DiVA: diva2:907979
Projects
RESTORE www.restore-project.org
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2009-450
Available from: 2016-03-01 Created: 2016-03-01 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(161 kB)46 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 161 kBChecksum SHA-512
1e062c8513b721efec4480519ecca0ce4cb19c9ec6f02f1dcbd935f896937311fc8281a8a5f1d26b520e26a8e46b92e2460a4181d5ff77c7604b7d814c2c9a61
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eckerberg, Katarina
By organisation
Department of Political Science
In the same journal
Restoration Ecology
EcologyEnvironmental SciencesPolitical Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 95 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 189 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf