Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Smartphone-based evaluations of clinical placements-a useful complement to web-based evaluation tools
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.
2015 (English)In: Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, ISSN 1975-5937, Vol. 12, UNSP 55Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Web-based questionnaires are currently the standard method for course evaluations. The high rate of smartphone adoption in Sweden makes possible a range of new uses, including course evaluation. This study examines the potential advantages and disadvantages of using a smartphone app as a complement to web-based course evaluation systems. Methods: An iPhone app for course evaluations was developed and interfaced to an existing web-based tool. Evaluations submitted using the app were compared with those submitted using the web between August 2012 and June 2013, at the Faculty of Medicine at Uppsala University, Sweden. Results: At the time of the study, 49% of the students were judged to own iPhones. Over the course of the study, 3,340 evaluations were submitted, of which 22.8% were submitted using the app. The median of mean scores in the submitted evaluations was 4.50 for the app (with an interquartile range of 3.70-5.20) and 4.60 (3.70-5.20) for the web (P=0.24). The proportion of evaluations that included a free-text comment was 50.5% for the app and 49.9% for the web (P=0.80). Conclusion: An app introduced as a complement to a web-based course evaluation system met with rapid adoption. We found no difference in the frequency of free-text comments or in the evaluation scores. Apps appear to be promising tools for course evaluations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 12, UNSP 55
Keyword [en]
Clinical education, Course evaluation, Education evaluation, Smartphone based tools
National Category
Pedagogical Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-276889DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.55ISI: 000368159100002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-276889DiVA: diva2:903685
Available from: 2016-02-16 Created: 2016-02-16 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(824 kB)110 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 824 kBChecksum SHA-512
a36f6f80730918d54d04f150bd4e99f7ac2de1f3e2b85f78ab11491740ed0bbbda4705d56e3d69ff0d238907db6293610355979ba7ee53f88775c31a78cd7e1d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Jakob
By organisation
Department of Medical SciencesAnaesthesiology and Intensive Care
In the same journal
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
Pedagogical Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 110 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 355 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf