Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Urban Options for Psychological Restoration: Common Strategies in Everyday Situations
Leiden Univ, Dept Social & Org Psychol, Leiden, Netherlands..
Univ Gavle, Dept Occupat & Publ Hlth Sci, Gavle, Sweden..
Grand Valley State Univ, Dept Psychol, Allendale, MI 49401 USA..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9970-9164
2016 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 11, no 1, e0146213Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Objectives Given the need for knowledge on the restorative potential of urban settings, we sought to estimate the effects of personal and contextual factors on preferences and restoration likelihood assessments for different urban activities-in-environments. We also sought to study the generality of these effects across different countries. Methods We conducted a true experiment with convenience samples of university students in the Netherlands (n = 80), Sweden (n = 100), and the USA (n = 316). In each country, the experiment had a mixed design with activities-in-environments (sitting in a park, sitting in a cafe, walking in a shopping mall, walking along a busy street) manipulated within-subjects and the need for restoration (attentional fatigue, no attentional fatigue) and immediate social context (in company, alone) manipulated between-subjects. The manipulations relied on previously tested scenarios describing everyday situations that participants were instructed to remember and imagine themselves being in. For each imagined situation (activity-in-environment with antecedent fatigue condition and immediate social context), subjects provided two criterion measures: general preference and the likelihood of achieving psychological restoration. Results The settings received different preference and restoration likelihood ratings as expected, affirming that a busy street, often used in comparisons with natural settings, is not representative of the restorative potential of urban settings. Being with a close friend and attentional fatigue both moderated ratings for specific settings. Findings of additional moderation by country of residence caution against broad generalizations regarding preferences for and the expected restorative effects of different urban settings. Conclusions Preferences and restoration likelihood ratings for urban activity-environment combinations are subject to multiple personal and contextual determinants, including level of attentional fatigue, being alone versus in company, and broader aspects of the urban context that vary across cities and countries. Claims regarding a lack of restorative quality in urban environments are problematic.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 11, no 1, e0146213
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-276822DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146213ISI: 000367801400117PubMedID: 26731272OAI: diva2:903498
Available from: 2016-02-16 Created: 2016-02-16 Last updated: 2016-05-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(289 kB)46 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 289 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hartig, Terry
By organisation
Department of PsychologyInstitute for Housing and Urban Research
In the same journal

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 46 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 71 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link