Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Robustness and Precision: How Data Quality May Influence Key Dependent Variables in Infant Eye-Tracker Analyses
University of Tampere. (Infant Cognition Lab)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0208-4212
2014 (English)In: Infancy, ISSN 1525-0008, E-ISSN 1532-7078, Vol. 19, no 5, 427-460 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In recent years, eye-tracking has become a popular method for drawing conclusions about infant cognition. Relatively little attention has been paid, however, to methodological issues associated with infant eye-tracking. Here, we consider the possibility that systematic differences in the quality of raw eye-tracking data obtained from different populations and individuals might create the impression of differences in gaze behavior, without this actually being the case. First, we show that lower quality eye-tracking data are obtained from populations who are younger and populations who are more fidgety and that data quality declines during the testing session. Second, we assess how these differences in data quality might influence key dependent variables in eye-tracking analyses. We show that lower precision data can appear to suggest a reduced likelihood to look at the eyes in a face relative to the mouth. We also show that less robust tracking may manifest as slower reaction time latencies (e.g., time to first fixation). Finally, we show that less robust data can manifest as shorter first look/visit duration. We argue that data quality should be reported in all analyses of infant eye-tracking data and/or that steps should be taken to control for data quality before performing final analyses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 19, no 5, 427-460 p.
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-276461DOI: 10.1111/infa.12055OAI: diva2:903082
Available from: 2016-02-13 Created: 2016-02-13 Last updated: 2016-02-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1326 kB)13 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1326 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forssman, Linda
In the same journal

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 13 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 25 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link