Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Species and abundance of ectoparasitic flies (Diptera) in pied flycatcher nests in Fennoscandia
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Parasites & Vectors, ISSN 1756-3305, E-ISSN 1756-3305, Vol. 8, 648Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Background: Birds host several ectoparasitic fly species with negative effects on nestling health and reproductive output, and with the capability of transmitting avian blood parasites. Information on the abundance and distribution of the ectoparasitic fly genera Ornithomya (Hippoboscidae) and Protocalliphora (Calliphoridae) in northern Europe is still generally poor, and we thus explored their geographic range and occurrence of these flies in the nests of a common avian model species, the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Methods: Nests of F. hypoleuca were collected from 21 locations across Fennoscandia in summer 2013, across a latitudinal gradient (between 56 degrees N - 70 degrees N) and examined for the presence of fly puparia. Adult specimens of Ornithomya spp. were also collected for species identification. Fly species were identified morphologically and identifications confirmed with DNA barcoding. Results: We found three species: two louse-flies - Ornithomya chloropus and O. avicularia - and one blow-fly, Protocalliphora azurea. The prevalence of O. avicularia was higher in southern latitudes and this species was not encountered beyond 62 degrees N whereas O. chloropus and P. azurea occurred across the whole range of latitudes. The prevalence of O. chloropus further increased with increasing distance from the coast - a pattern not documented before. The three fly species showed no interspecific associations in their prevalence. Conclusions: Our study revealed relatively high prevalence for all the species (O. chloropus 59 %, O. avicularia 20 %, P. azurea 32 %), and an interesting spatial pattern in the prevalence of the two louse fly species. Our sample did not indicate any major range shifts towards the north for the southern species as compared to the information from the past. Morphological identification of O. chloropus did not match with the corresponding sequences published in the GenBank and taxonomy of this group calls for further studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2015. Vol. 8, 648
Keyword [en]
Blood parasites, Bird blowflies, Ectoparasite prevalence, Louse flies, Pied flycatcher
National Category
Zoology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-114617DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-1267-6ISI: 000367081000003PubMedID: 26691851OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-114617DiVA: diva2:900932
Available from: 2016-02-05 Created: 2016-01-25 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2162 kB)66 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2162 kBChecksum SHA-512
d3655c6ecdb65481772ca1e10965a61b8d93d60d674820a3648aae38db9aba58ce29b65b5d04f8b83cde49a7f12c35f20d4b7c4bdf6f7083be6be78c11420535
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Parasites & Vectors
Zoology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 66 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 111 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf