Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Do people take stimulus correlations into account in visual search?
University of Houston.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
New York University.
University of Houston.
2016 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 11, no 3, e0149402Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In laboratory visual search experiments, distractors are often statistically independent of each other. However, stimuli in more naturalistic settings are often correlated and rarely independent. Here, we examine whether human observers take stimulus correlations into account in orientation target detection. We find that they do, although probably not optimally. In particular, it seems that low distractor correlations are overestimated. Our results might contribute to bridging the gap between artificial and natural visual search tasks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 11, no 3, e0149402
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-275324DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149402ISI: 000371993000013PubMedID: 26963498OAI: diva2:899938
Available from: 2016-02-02 Created: 2016-02-02 Last updated: 2016-04-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1263 kB)20 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1263 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Van den Berg, Ronald
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 20 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 30 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link